Sheldon Pollock and Max Weber: Why Pollock is more Weberian than he thinks
Sheldon Pollock is the leading North American Indologist and his magnum opus, The Language of the Gods in the World of Men: Sanskrit, Culture, and Power in Premodern India, is a field-defining classic. Pollock takes himself to be a fierce critic of Max Weber, but in fact his comparative historical a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
Quotus Publishing
2018
|
| _version_ | 1797069321926606848 |
|---|---|
| author | Gellner, D |
| author_facet | Gellner, D |
| author_sort | Gellner, D |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Sheldon Pollock is the leading North American Indologist and his magnum opus, The Language of the Gods in the World of Men: Sanskrit, Culture, and Power in Premodern India, is a field-defining classic. Pollock takes himself to be a fierce critic of Max Weber, but in fact his comparative historical approach shares much with Weber, and where it is wanting would have benefited from more, not less, Weberian influence. Pollock’s vision of language history and his views on religion and legitimation are considered in detail. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:22:43Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:559e936b-0615-49b6-906b-cb57494549dc |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:22:43Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | Quotus Publishing |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:559e936b-0615-49b6-906b-cb57494549dc2022-03-26T16:45:03ZSheldon Pollock and Max Weber: Why Pollock is more Weberian than he thinksJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:559e936b-0615-49b6-906b-cb57494549dcSymplectic Elements at OxfordQuotus Publishing2018Gellner, DSheldon Pollock is the leading North American Indologist and his magnum opus, The Language of the Gods in the World of Men: Sanskrit, Culture, and Power in Premodern India, is a field-defining classic. Pollock takes himself to be a fierce critic of Max Weber, but in fact his comparative historical approach shares much with Weber, and where it is wanting would have benefited from more, not less, Weberian influence. Pollock’s vision of language history and his views on religion and legitimation are considered in detail. |
| spellingShingle | Gellner, D Sheldon Pollock and Max Weber: Why Pollock is more Weberian than he thinks |
| title | Sheldon Pollock and Max Weber: Why Pollock is more Weberian than he thinks |
| title_full | Sheldon Pollock and Max Weber: Why Pollock is more Weberian than he thinks |
| title_fullStr | Sheldon Pollock and Max Weber: Why Pollock is more Weberian than he thinks |
| title_full_unstemmed | Sheldon Pollock and Max Weber: Why Pollock is more Weberian than he thinks |
| title_short | Sheldon Pollock and Max Weber: Why Pollock is more Weberian than he thinks |
| title_sort | sheldon pollock and max weber why pollock is more weberian than he thinks |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gellnerd sheldonpollockandmaxweberwhypollockismoreweberianthanhethinks |