Dosimetric features of linac head and phantom scattered radiation outside the clinical photon beam: experimental measurements and comparison with treatment planning system calculations.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dosimetric measurements and treatment planning system (TPS) calculations in the region outside the clinical photon beams have been investigated. The aim was to estimate the calculation accuracy of a specific TPS in areas that are becoming increasingly relevant with the advent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cozzi, L, Buffa, F, Fogliata, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2001
_version_ 1826273174743941120
author Cozzi, L
Buffa, F
Fogliata, A
author_facet Cozzi, L
Buffa, F
Fogliata, A
author_sort Cozzi, L
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dosimetric measurements and treatment planning system (TPS) calculations in the region outside the clinical photon beams have been investigated. The aim was to estimate the calculation accuracy of a specific TPS in areas that are becoming increasingly relevant with the advent of new technologies, such as, for example, intensity modulation radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Measurements were performed on two different linacs to obtain, separately, the head scatter (electrons and photons), the transmission below the jaws and the phantom scatter outside the primary beam for different photon energies, distances from the field edge and field sizes. Calculations with a commercial TPS (Helax TMS) were then obtained and compared with these measurements. RESULTS: In general, reasonable agreement between calculations and measurements was obtained (1-2%), especially for photon scattering (head and phantom). Nevertheless, some discrepancies were found in the electron contamination computation, due probably to the approximations and assumptions made in the TPS calculation algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: The analyzed TPS presented good results, but for some particular clinical cases and moreover for advanced techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy, the calculation behaviour with respect to measurements and patient dose delivery should be carefully evaluated.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:24:10Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:5618c98e-46f1-4008-bfae-d11cec975a3f
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:24:10Z
publishDate 2001
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:5618c98e-46f1-4008-bfae-d11cec975a3f2022-03-26T16:48:09ZDosimetric features of linac head and phantom scattered radiation outside the clinical photon beam: experimental measurements and comparison with treatment planning system calculations.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:5618c98e-46f1-4008-bfae-d11cec975a3fEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2001Cozzi, LBuffa, FFogliata, ABACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dosimetric measurements and treatment planning system (TPS) calculations in the region outside the clinical photon beams have been investigated. The aim was to estimate the calculation accuracy of a specific TPS in areas that are becoming increasingly relevant with the advent of new technologies, such as, for example, intensity modulation radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Measurements were performed on two different linacs to obtain, separately, the head scatter (electrons and photons), the transmission below the jaws and the phantom scatter outside the primary beam for different photon energies, distances from the field edge and field sizes. Calculations with a commercial TPS (Helax TMS) were then obtained and compared with these measurements. RESULTS: In general, reasonable agreement between calculations and measurements was obtained (1-2%), especially for photon scattering (head and phantom). Nevertheless, some discrepancies were found in the electron contamination computation, due probably to the approximations and assumptions made in the TPS calculation algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: The analyzed TPS presented good results, but for some particular clinical cases and moreover for advanced techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy, the calculation behaviour with respect to measurements and patient dose delivery should be carefully evaluated.
spellingShingle Cozzi, L
Buffa, F
Fogliata, A
Dosimetric features of linac head and phantom scattered radiation outside the clinical photon beam: experimental measurements and comparison with treatment planning system calculations.
title Dosimetric features of linac head and phantom scattered radiation outside the clinical photon beam: experimental measurements and comparison with treatment planning system calculations.
title_full Dosimetric features of linac head and phantom scattered radiation outside the clinical photon beam: experimental measurements and comparison with treatment planning system calculations.
title_fullStr Dosimetric features of linac head and phantom scattered radiation outside the clinical photon beam: experimental measurements and comparison with treatment planning system calculations.
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric features of linac head and phantom scattered radiation outside the clinical photon beam: experimental measurements and comparison with treatment planning system calculations.
title_short Dosimetric features of linac head and phantom scattered radiation outside the clinical photon beam: experimental measurements and comparison with treatment planning system calculations.
title_sort dosimetric features of linac head and phantom scattered radiation outside the clinical photon beam experimental measurements and comparison with treatment planning system calculations
work_keys_str_mv AT cozzil dosimetricfeaturesoflinacheadandphantomscatteredradiationoutsidetheclinicalphotonbeamexperimentalmeasurementsandcomparisonwithtreatmentplanningsystemcalculations
AT buffaf dosimetricfeaturesoflinacheadandphantomscatteredradiationoutsidetheclinicalphotonbeamexperimentalmeasurementsandcomparisonwithtreatmentplanningsystemcalculations
AT fogliataa dosimetricfeaturesoflinacheadandphantomscatteredradiationoutsidetheclinicalphotonbeamexperimentalmeasurementsandcomparisonwithtreatmentplanningsystemcalculations