Overinterpretation of findings in machine learning prediction model studies in oncology: a systematic review

Overinterpretation of findings in machine learning prediction model studies in oncology: a systematic review

<strong>Objectives<br></strong> In biomedical research, spin is the overinterpretation of findings, and it is a growing concern. To date, the presence of spin has not been evaluated in prognostic model research in oncology, including studies developing and validating models for ind...

Fuld beskrivelse

Bibliografiske detaljer
Main Authors:	Dhiman, P, Ma, J, Andaur Navarro, CL, Speich, B, Bullock, G, Damen, JAA, Hooft, L, Kirtley, S, Riley, RD, Van Calster, B, Moons, KGM, Collins, GS
Format:	Journal article
Sprog:	English
Udgivet:	Elsevier 2023

Lignende værker

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
af: Dhiman, P, et al.
Udgivet: (2022)

Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review
af: Dhiman, P, et al.
Udgivet: (2022)

Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved
af: Dhiman, P, et al.
Udgivet: (2021)

Systematic review finds "spin" practices and poor reporting standards in studies on machine learning-based prediction models
af: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Udgivet: (2023)

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
af: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Udgivet: (2022)

Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review
af: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Udgivet: (2021)

Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor studies in oncology: a systematic review
af: Kempf, E, et al.
Udgivet: (2018)

Systematic review identifies the design and methodological conduct of studies on machine learning-based prediction models
af: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Udgivet: (2022)

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
af: Paula Dhiman, et al.
Udgivet: (2022-07-01)

Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor studies in medical oncology
af: Kempf, E, et al.
Udgivet: (2016)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)
af: Snell, KIE, et al.
Udgivet: (2023)

Risk of bias assessments in individual participant data meta-analyses of test accuracy and prediction models: a review shows improvements are needed
af: Levis, B, et al.
Udgivet: (2023)

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques
af: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Udgivet: (2020)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
af: Collins, GS, et al.
Udgivet: (2021)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data: TRIPOD-Cluster checklist
af: Debray, TPA, et al.
Udgivet: (2023)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data (TRIPOD-Cluster): explanation and elaboration
af: Debray, TPA, et al.
Udgivet: (2023)

Overinterpretation is common in pathological diagnosis of appendix cancer during patient referral for oncologic care.
af: Mark A Valasek, et al.
Udgivet: (2017-01-01)

Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 1): from development to external validation
af: Collins, GS, et al.
Udgivet: (2024)

Mosaicism in preimplantation embryos: Are we overinterpreting the results?
af: Glenn Schattman, M.D.
Udgivet: (2023-09-01)

Open science practices need substantial improvement in prognostic model studies in oncology using machine learning
af: Collins, GS, et al.
Udgivet: (2023)

A note on estimating the Cox-Snell R2 from a reported C statistic (AUROC) to inform sample size calculations for developing a prediction model with a binary outcome
af: Riley, RD, et al.
Udgivet: (2020)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models in journal and conference abstracts: TRIPOD for abstracts
af: Heus, P, et al.
Udgivet: (2020)

Overinterpretation and Overtreatment of Low-Titer Antibodies Against Contactin-Associated Protein-2
af: Christian G. Bien
Udgivet: (2018-04-01)

Interpretation and Overinterpretation of Ja’far Ibn Hasan Al-Barzanji’s Mawlid Al-Barzanji
af: Fadlil Munawwar Mashur
Udgivet: (2017-10-01)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
af: Gary S Collins, et al.
Udgivet: (2021-07-01)

Multivariate unmixing approaches on Raman images of plant cell walls: new insights or overinterpretation of results?
af: Batirtze Prats-Mateu, et al.
Udgivet: (2018-07-01)

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques
af: Gary S Collins, et al.
Udgivet: (2020-11-01)

Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society
af: Van Calster, B, et al.
Udgivet: (2021)

TRIPOD statement: a preliminary pre-post analysis of reporting and methods of prediction models
af: Zamanipoor Najafabadi, AH, et al.
Udgivet: (2020)

Reporting guidelines used varying methodology to develop recommendations
af: Schlussel, MM, et al.
Udgivet: (2023)

On the aggregation of published prognostic scores for causal inference in observational studies
af: Nguyen, T-L, et al.
Udgivet: (2020)

PROBAST: A tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies
af: Wolff, RF, et al.
Udgivet: (2019)

Sample size requirements are not being considered in studies developing prediction models for binary outcomes: a systematic review
af: Dhiman, P, et al.
Udgivet: (2023)

A systematic review showed more consideration is needed when conducting nonrandomized studies of interventions.
af: Dhiman, P, et al.
Udgivet: (2019)

Poor handling of continuous predictors in clinical prediction models using logistic regression: a systematic review
af: Ma, J, et al.
Udgivet: (2023)

Regarding a nomogram to predict osteoradionecrosis in oral cancer after marginal mandibulectomy and radiotherapy
af: Collins, GS, et al.
Udgivet: (2019)

Artificial intelligence in lung cancer diagnostic imaging: a review of the reporting and conduct of research published 2018–2019
af: Logullo, P, et al.
Udgivet: (2023)

A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes
af: Debray, T, et al.
Udgivet: (2018)

Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model using multinomial logistic regression
af: Pate, A, et al.
Udgivet: (2023)

Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19 infection: systematic review and critical appraisal
af: Wynants, L, et al.
Udgivet: (2020)