Overinterpretation of findings in machine learning prediction model studies in oncology: a systematic review

Overinterpretation of findings in machine learning prediction model studies in oncology: a systematic review

<strong>Objectives<br></strong> In biomedical research, spin is the overinterpretation of findings, and it is a growing concern. To date, the presence of spin has not been evaluated in prognostic model research in oncology, including studies developing and validating models for ind...

Полное описание

Библиографические подробности
Главные авторы:	Dhiman, P, Ma, J, Andaur Navarro, CL, Speich, B, Bullock, G, Damen, JAA, Hooft, L, Kirtley, S, Riley, RD, Van Calster, B, Moons, KGM, Collins, GS
Формат:	Journal article
Язык:	English
Опубликовано:	Elsevier 2023

Схожие документы

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
по: Dhiman, P, и др.
Опубликовано: (2022)

Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review
по: Dhiman, P, и др.
Опубликовано: (2022)

Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved
по: Dhiman, P, и др.
Опубликовано: (2021)

Systematic review finds "spin" practices and poor reporting standards in studies on machine learning-based prediction models
по: Andaur Navarro, CL, и др.
Опубликовано: (2023)

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
по: Andaur Navarro, CL, и др.
Опубликовано: (2022)

Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review
по: Andaur Navarro, CL, и др.
Опубликовано: (2021)

Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor studies in oncology: a systematic review
по: Kempf, E, и др.
Опубликовано: (2018)

Systematic review identifies the design and methodological conduct of studies on machine learning-based prediction models
по: Andaur Navarro, CL, и др.
Опубликовано: (2022)

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
по: Paula Dhiman, и др.
Опубликовано: (2022-07-01)

Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor studies in medical oncology
по: Kempf, E, и др.
Опубликовано: (2016)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)
по: Snell, KIE, и др.
Опубликовано: (2023)

Risk of bias assessments in individual participant data meta-analyses of test accuracy and prediction models: a review shows improvements are needed
по: Levis, B, и др.
Опубликовано: (2023)

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques
по: Andaur Navarro, CL, и др.
Опубликовано: (2020)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
по: Collins, GS, и др.
Опубликовано: (2021)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data: TRIPOD-Cluster checklist
по: Debray, TPA, и др.
Опубликовано: (2023)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data (TRIPOD-Cluster): explanation and elaboration
по: Debray, TPA, и др.
Опубликовано: (2023)

Overinterpretation is common in pathological diagnosis of appendix cancer during patient referral for oncologic care.
по: Mark A Valasek, и др.
Опубликовано: (2017-01-01)

Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 1): from development to external validation
по: Collins, GS, и др.
Опубликовано: (2024)

Mosaicism in preimplantation embryos: Are we overinterpreting the results?
по: Glenn Schattman, M.D.
Опубликовано: (2023-09-01)

Open science practices need substantial improvement in prognostic model studies in oncology using machine learning
по: Collins, GS, и др.
Опубликовано: (2023)

A note on estimating the Cox-Snell R2 from a reported C statistic (AUROC) to inform sample size calculations for developing a prediction model with a binary outcome
по: Riley, RD, и др.
Опубликовано: (2020)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models in journal and conference abstracts: TRIPOD for abstracts
по: Heus, P, и др.
Опубликовано: (2020)

Overinterpretation and Overtreatment of Low-Titer Antibodies Against Contactin-Associated Protein-2
по: Christian G. Bien
Опубликовано: (2018-04-01)

Interpretation and Overinterpretation of Ja’far Ibn Hasan Al-Barzanji’s Mawlid Al-Barzanji
по: Fadlil Munawwar Mashur
Опубликовано: (2017-10-01)

Multivariate unmixing approaches on Raman images of plant cell walls: new insights or overinterpretation of results?
по: Batirtze Prats-Mateu, и др.
Опубликовано: (2018-07-01)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
по: Gary S Collins, и др.
Опубликовано: (2021-07-01)

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques
по: Gary S Collins, и др.
Опубликовано: (2020-11-01)

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
по: Constanza L. Andaur Navarro, и др.
Опубликовано: (2022-01-01)

Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society
по: Van Calster, B, и др.
Опубликовано: (2021)

TRIPOD statement: a preliminary pre-post analysis of reporting and methods of prediction models
по: Zamanipoor Najafabadi, AH, и др.
Опубликовано: (2020)

Reporting guidelines used varying methodology to develop recommendations
по: Schlussel, MM, и др.
Опубликовано: (2023)

On the aggregation of published prognostic scores for causal inference in observational studies
по: Nguyen, T-L, и др.
Опубликовано: (2020)

PROBAST: A tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies
по: Wolff, RF, и др.
Опубликовано: (2019)

Sample size requirements are not being considered in studies developing prediction models for binary outcomes: a systematic review
по: Dhiman, P, и др.
Опубликовано: (2023)

A systematic review showed more consideration is needed when conducting nonrandomized studies of interventions.
по: Dhiman, P, и др.
Опубликовано: (2019)

Poor handling of continuous predictors in clinical prediction models using logistic regression: a systematic review
по: Ma, J, и др.
Опубликовано: (2023)

Artificial intelligence in lung cancer diagnostic imaging: a review of the reporting and conduct of research published 2018–2019
по: Logullo, P, и др.
Опубликовано: (2023)

Regarding a nomogram to predict osteoradionecrosis in oral cancer after marginal mandibulectomy and radiotherapy
по: Collins, GS, и др.
Опубликовано: (2019)

A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes
по: Debray, T, и др.
Опубликовано: (2018)

Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model using multinomial logistic regression
по: Pate, A, и др.
Опубликовано: (2023)