Overinterpretation of findings in machine learning prediction model studies in oncology: a systematic review

Overinterpretation of findings in machine learning prediction model studies in oncology: a systematic review

<strong>Objectives<br></strong> In biomedical research, spin is the overinterpretation of findings, and it is a growing concern. To date, the presence of spin has not been evaluated in prognostic model research in oncology, including studies developing and validating models for ind...

Повний опис

Бібліографічні деталі
Автори:	Dhiman, P, Ma, J, Andaur Navarro, CL, Speich, B, Bullock, G, Damen, JAA, Hooft, L, Kirtley, S, Riley, RD, Van Calster, B, Moons, KGM, Collins, GS
Формат:	Journal article
Мова:	English
Опубліковано:	Elsevier 2023

Схожі ресурси

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
за авторством: Dhiman, P, та інші
Опубліковано: (2022)

Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review
за авторством: Dhiman, P, та інші
Опубліковано: (2022)

Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved
за авторством: Dhiman, P, та інші
Опубліковано: (2021)

Systematic review finds "spin" practices and poor reporting standards in studies on machine learning-based prediction models
за авторством: Andaur Navarro, CL, та інші
Опубліковано: (2023)

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
за авторством: Andaur Navarro, CL, та інші
Опубліковано: (2022)

Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review
за авторством: Andaur Navarro, CL, та інші
Опубліковано: (2021)

Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor studies in oncology: a systematic review
за авторством: Kempf, E, та інші
Опубліковано: (2018)

Systematic review identifies the design and methodological conduct of studies on machine learning-based prediction models
за авторством: Andaur Navarro, CL, та інші
Опубліковано: (2022)

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
за авторством: Paula Dhiman, та інші
Опубліковано: (2022-07-01)

Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor studies in medical oncology
за авторством: Kempf, E, та інші
Опубліковано: (2016)

Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review
за авторством: Paula Dhiman, та інші
Опубліковано: (2022-04-01)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)
за авторством: Snell, KIE, та інші
Опубліковано: (2023)

Risk of bias assessments in individual participant data meta-analyses of test accuracy and prediction models: a review shows improvements are needed
за авторством: Levis, B, та інші
Опубліковано: (2023)

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques
за авторством: Andaur Navarro, CL, та інші
Опубліковано: (2020)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
за авторством: Collins, GS, та інші
Опубліковано: (2021)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data: TRIPOD-Cluster checklist
за авторством: Debray, TPA, та інші
Опубліковано: (2023)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data (TRIPOD-Cluster): explanation and elaboration
за авторством: Debray, TPA, та інші
Опубліковано: (2023)

Overinterpretation is common in pathological diagnosis of appendix cancer during patient referral for oncologic care.
за авторством: Mark A Valasek, та інші
Опубліковано: (2017-01-01)

Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 1): from development to external validation
за авторством: Collins, GS, та інші
Опубліковано: (2024)

Mosaicism in preimplantation embryos: Are we overinterpreting the results?
за авторством: Glenn Schattman, M.D.
Опубліковано: (2023-09-01)

Open science practices need substantial improvement in prognostic model studies in oncology using machine learning
за авторством: Collins, GS, та інші
Опубліковано: (2023)

A note on estimating the Cox-Snell R2 from a reported C statistic (AUROC) to inform sample size calculations for developing a prediction model with a binary outcome
за авторством: Riley, RD, та інші
Опубліковано: (2020)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models in journal and conference abstracts: TRIPOD for abstracts
за авторством: Heus, P, та інші
Опубліковано: (2020)

Overinterpretation and Overtreatment of Low-Titer Antibodies Against Contactin-Associated Protein-2
за авторством: Christian G. Bien
Опубліковано: (2018-04-01)

Spin in Published Reports of Tinnitus Randomized Controlled Trials: Evidence of Overinterpretation of Results
за авторством: Hedwig M. Velde, та інші
Опубліковано: (2021-07-01)

Interpretation and Overinterpretation of Ja’far Ibn Hasan Al-Barzanji’s Mawlid Al-Barzanji
за авторством: Fadlil Munawwar Mashur
Опубліковано: (2017-10-01)

Multivariate unmixing approaches on Raman images of plant cell walls: new insights or overinterpretation of results?
за авторством: Batirtze Prats-Mateu, та інші
Опубліковано: (2018-07-01)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
за авторством: Gary S Collins, та інші
Опубліковано: (2021-07-01)

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques
за авторством: Gary S Collins, та інші
Опубліковано: (2020-11-01)

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
за авторством: Constanza L. Andaur Navarro, та інші
Опубліковано: (2022-01-01)

Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society
за авторством: Van Calster, B, та інші
Опубліковано: (2021)

TRIPOD statement: a preliminary pre-post analysis of reporting and methods of prediction models
за авторством: Zamanipoor Najafabadi, AH, та інші
Опубліковано: (2020)

On the aggregation of published prognostic scores for causal inference in observational studies
за авторством: Nguyen, T-L, та інші
Опубліковано: (2020)

Reporting guidelines used varying methodology to develop recommendations
за авторством: Schlussel, MM, та інші
Опубліковано: (2023)

PROBAST: A tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies
за авторством: Wolff, RF, та інші
Опубліковано: (2019)

Sample size requirements are not being considered in studies developing prediction models for binary outcomes: a systematic review
за авторством: Dhiman, P, та інші
Опубліковано: (2023)

A systematic review showed more consideration is needed when conducting nonrandomized studies of interventions.
за авторством: Dhiman, P, та інші
Опубліковано: (2019)

Poor handling of continuous predictors in clinical prediction models using logistic regression: a systematic review
за авторством: Ma, J, та інші
Опубліковано: (2023)

Artificial intelligence in lung cancer diagnostic imaging: a review of the reporting and conduct of research published 2018–2019
за авторством: Logullo, P, та інші
Опубліковано: (2023)

Regarding a nomogram to predict osteoradionecrosis in oral cancer after marginal mandibulectomy and radiotherapy
за авторством: Collins, GS, та інші
Опубліковано: (2019)