Best-practice indicators in Psoriatic disease care
<br><strong>Objective: </strong>In 2016, members of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA), in collaboration with KPMG LLP (UK), conducted a study to measure care in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). A key finding was that centers do not usuall...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Journal of Rheumatology
2019
|
_version_ | 1797069597477699584 |
---|---|
author | Helliwell, P Favier, G Gladman, D Soriano, E Kirkham, B Coates, L Puig, L Boehncke, W Thaçi, D |
author_facet | Helliwell, P Favier, G Gladman, D Soriano, E Kirkham, B Coates, L Puig, L Boehncke, W Thaçi, D |
author_sort | Helliwell, P |
collection | OXFORD |
description | <br><strong>Objective: </strong>In 2016, members of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA), in collaboration with KPMG LLP (UK), conducted a study to measure care in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). A key finding was that centers do not usually have processes in place to measure the effect of improved quality of care. Our objectives were to identify and select best-practice indicators to enable PsA caregivers to assess and monitor the outcomes of specific initiatives aimed at improving care in 4 focus areas: (1) shortening time to diagnosis; (2) improving multidisciplinary collaboration; (3) optimizing disease management; and (4) improving disease monitoring.</br>
<br><strong>Methods: </strong>(1) Structured review of scientific and grey literature to obtain evidence for a long list of 100 potential indicators across the 4 focus areas; (2) survey expert rheumatologists and dermatologists to review the long list and identify the most meaningful and feasible indicators for use in day-to-day practice; (3) consensus discussion to identify a shortlist of indicators based on predefined selection criteria; (4) electronic group discussion to refine definitions of shortlisted indicators and targets; and (5) review of the shortlisted indicators at the annual GRAPPA meeting in July 2018 to ensure the indicators meet the preliminary criteria.</br>
<br><strong>Results: </strong>The expert group arrived at a consensus with a shortlist of 8 best-practice indicators across 4 key focus areas aligned with the patient pathway.</br>
<br><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were 8 evidence-based best-practice indicators and respective targets that were identified to enable the monitoring of quality of care and target improvements.</br> |
first_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:26:49Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:56f0988b-0d36-42dc-9080-81c6eac867b6 |
institution | University of Oxford |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:26:49Z |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Journal of Rheumatology |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:56f0988b-0d36-42dc-9080-81c6eac867b62022-03-26T16:53:33ZBest-practice indicators in Psoriatic disease careJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:56f0988b-0d36-42dc-9080-81c6eac867b6EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordJournal of Rheumatology2019Helliwell, PFavier, GGladman, DSoriano, EKirkham, BCoates, LPuig, LBoehncke, WThaçi, D<br><strong>Objective: </strong>In 2016, members of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA), in collaboration with KPMG LLP (UK), conducted a study to measure care in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). A key finding was that centers do not usually have processes in place to measure the effect of improved quality of care. Our objectives were to identify and select best-practice indicators to enable PsA caregivers to assess and monitor the outcomes of specific initiatives aimed at improving care in 4 focus areas: (1) shortening time to diagnosis; (2) improving multidisciplinary collaboration; (3) optimizing disease management; and (4) improving disease monitoring.</br> <br><strong>Methods: </strong>(1) Structured review of scientific and grey literature to obtain evidence for a long list of 100 potential indicators across the 4 focus areas; (2) survey expert rheumatologists and dermatologists to review the long list and identify the most meaningful and feasible indicators for use in day-to-day practice; (3) consensus discussion to identify a shortlist of indicators based on predefined selection criteria; (4) electronic group discussion to refine definitions of shortlisted indicators and targets; and (5) review of the shortlisted indicators at the annual GRAPPA meeting in July 2018 to ensure the indicators meet the preliminary criteria.</br> <br><strong>Results: </strong>The expert group arrived at a consensus with a shortlist of 8 best-practice indicators across 4 key focus areas aligned with the patient pathway.</br> <br><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were 8 evidence-based best-practice indicators and respective targets that were identified to enable the monitoring of quality of care and target improvements.</br> |
spellingShingle | Helliwell, P Favier, G Gladman, D Soriano, E Kirkham, B Coates, L Puig, L Boehncke, W Thaçi, D Best-practice indicators in Psoriatic disease care |
title | Best-practice indicators in Psoriatic disease care |
title_full | Best-practice indicators in Psoriatic disease care |
title_fullStr | Best-practice indicators in Psoriatic disease care |
title_full_unstemmed | Best-practice indicators in Psoriatic disease care |
title_short | Best-practice indicators in Psoriatic disease care |
title_sort | best practice indicators in psoriatic disease care |
work_keys_str_mv | AT helliwellp bestpracticeindicatorsinpsoriaticdiseasecare AT favierg bestpracticeindicatorsinpsoriaticdiseasecare AT gladmand bestpracticeindicatorsinpsoriaticdiseasecare AT sorianoe bestpracticeindicatorsinpsoriaticdiseasecare AT kirkhamb bestpracticeindicatorsinpsoriaticdiseasecare AT coatesl bestpracticeindicatorsinpsoriaticdiseasecare AT puigl bestpracticeindicatorsinpsoriaticdiseasecare AT boehnckew bestpracticeindicatorsinpsoriaticdiseasecare AT thacid bestpracticeindicatorsinpsoriaticdiseasecare |