Bring up the bodies: international order, empire, and re-thinking the Great War (1914–1918) from below

What does international order look like when analysed from its margins? Such a question is the obvious consequence of efforts within International Relations (IR) to take empire, colonialism and hierarchy more seriously. This article addresses this question by examining one of IR’s most important tou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sabaratnam, M
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 2023
_version_ 1797112572178071552
author Sabaratnam, M
author_facet Sabaratnam, M
author_sort Sabaratnam, M
collection OXFORD
description What does international order look like when analysed from its margins? Such a question is the obvious consequence of efforts within International Relations (IR) to take empire, colonialism and hierarchy more seriously. This article addresses this question by examining one of IR’s most important touchstones – the Great War – through the experiences of peoples in southeast Africa. It argues that to do this, we should use the methodological approaches of histories ‘from below’ and contrapuntal analysis. When looking at the Great War from the vantage point of southeast Africa (contemporary Mozambique), the key patterns of interaction organising the international look different to those emphasised in traditional accounts of international order and hierarchy. Notable features are the significant continuities and intersections between structures of war and colonialism, the racialisation of death and suffering, the effects of white imperial prestige as a strategic preoccupation and the deep historical roots of anti-colonial resistance. Reading upwards and contrapuntally from these histories, the paper argues for a redescription of international order as reflecting not predominantly a balance of power or a normative framework for the organisation of authority, but a dynamic matrix of structural violence. Reading order from below in this way helps us better capture how the international is implicated in the production and reproduction of everyday life for many people, as well as in more dramatic political transformations such as those generated by experiences of war and resistance to colonialism.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T08:26:03Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:56f124e6-a940-4d90-8988-eef7b170a115
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T08:26:03Z
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:56f124e6-a940-4d90-8988-eef7b170a1152024-02-19T12:47:01ZBring up the bodies: international order, empire, and re-thinking the Great War (1914–1918) from belowJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:56f124e6-a940-4d90-8988-eef7b170a115EnglishSymplectic ElementsSAGE Publications2023Sabaratnam, MWhat does international order look like when analysed from its margins? Such a question is the obvious consequence of efforts within International Relations (IR) to take empire, colonialism and hierarchy more seriously. This article addresses this question by examining one of IR’s most important touchstones – the Great War – through the experiences of peoples in southeast Africa. It argues that to do this, we should use the methodological approaches of histories ‘from below’ and contrapuntal analysis. When looking at the Great War from the vantage point of southeast Africa (contemporary Mozambique), the key patterns of interaction organising the international look different to those emphasised in traditional accounts of international order and hierarchy. Notable features are the significant continuities and intersections between structures of war and colonialism, the racialisation of death and suffering, the effects of white imperial prestige as a strategic preoccupation and the deep historical roots of anti-colonial resistance. Reading upwards and contrapuntally from these histories, the paper argues for a redescription of international order as reflecting not predominantly a balance of power or a normative framework for the organisation of authority, but a dynamic matrix of structural violence. Reading order from below in this way helps us better capture how the international is implicated in the production and reproduction of everyday life for many people, as well as in more dramatic political transformations such as those generated by experiences of war and resistance to colonialism.
spellingShingle Sabaratnam, M
Bring up the bodies: international order, empire, and re-thinking the Great War (1914–1918) from below
title Bring up the bodies: international order, empire, and re-thinking the Great War (1914–1918) from below
title_full Bring up the bodies: international order, empire, and re-thinking the Great War (1914–1918) from below
title_fullStr Bring up the bodies: international order, empire, and re-thinking the Great War (1914–1918) from below
title_full_unstemmed Bring up the bodies: international order, empire, and re-thinking the Great War (1914–1918) from below
title_short Bring up the bodies: international order, empire, and re-thinking the Great War (1914–1918) from below
title_sort bring up the bodies international order empire and re thinking the great war 1914 1918 from below
work_keys_str_mv AT sabaratnamm bringupthebodiesinternationalorderempireandrethinkingthegreatwar19141918frombelow