Public reason and religion: the theo-ethical equilibrium argument for restraint
Most public reason theorists believe that citizens are under a ‘duty of restraint’. Citizens must refrain from supporting laws for which they have only non-public reasons. The theo-ethical equilibrium argument purports to show that theists should accept this duty, on the basis of their religious con...
Main Author: | Billingham, P |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Published: |
Springer Netherlands
2017
|
Similar Items
-
Consensus, convergence, restraint, and religion
by: Billingham, P
Published: (2018) -
Law, religion, and public reason
by: Billingham, P, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Cohen and Natorp’s Philosophy of Religion: the Argument about the Boundary of Reason
by: Belov V. N.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
A framework for analyzing public reason theories
by: Billingham, P, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Can civic friendship ground public reason?
by: Billingham, P, et al.
Published: (2023)