CoQ10 fails to protect brain against focal and global ischemia in rats.
OBJECTIVE: Release of oxygen free radicals occurs following cerebral ischemia. Studies show that oxygen free radicals mediate ischemic brain injury. CoQ10 is a potent free radical scavenger and may offset brain injury associated with reperfusion. We tested exogeneous CoQ10 as a neuroprotectant in ra...
| Asıl Yazarlar: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Materyal Türü: | Journal article |
| Dil: | English |
| Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
2000
|
| _version_ | 1826273487433498624 |
|---|---|
| author | Li, H Klein, G Sun, P Buchan, A |
| author_facet | Li, H Klein, G Sun, P Buchan, A |
| author_sort | Li, H |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | OBJECTIVE: Release of oxygen free radicals occurs following cerebral ischemia. Studies show that oxygen free radicals mediate ischemic brain injury. CoQ10 is a potent free radical scavenger and may offset brain injury associated with reperfusion. We tested exogeneous CoQ10 as a neuroprotectant in rats following both global and focal ischemic insults. METHODS: Rats were subjected to either 4-vessel occlusion ischemia (4-VO, 10 min occlusion, 7-day survival) or middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO, 120 min-occlusion, 22.5 h survival). Regional cerebral blood flows (rCBF) and physiological variables such as blood pressure, pO2, pCO2, plasma glucose and hematocrit were monitored and measured in focal ischemia. The animals were randomized to receive treatments of either phosphate buffered saline (PBS) vehicle or CoQ10 following global or focal ischemia. Injection times were at the end of ischemia and 3 h later for both models of ischemia. Histological outcomes are expressed as a percentage of hippocampal CA(1) cell injury in global ischemia or percentage of cortical infarct over that of non-ischemic hemisphere in focal ischemia. RESULTS: In global ischemia, animals treated with PBS vehicle and CoQ10 had 86+/-5% (n=8) and 83+/-10% (n=8), respectively, of hippocampal CA(1) cell injury (P>0.05). The percentage of infarct volumes in animals following focal ischemia were 23+/-9% (control, n=10) and 25+/-9% (CoQ10, n=10). There were no temperature or physiological differences between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Acute treatment with CoQ10 via intraperitoneal injection does not prevent neuronal injuries following global and focal ischemia. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:28:55Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:579ff819-ea54-41ab-822e-e14acc60b288 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:28:55Z |
| publishDate | 2000 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:579ff819-ea54-41ab-822e-e14acc60b2882022-03-26T16:57:51ZCoQ10 fails to protect brain against focal and global ischemia in rats.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:579ff819-ea54-41ab-822e-e14acc60b288EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2000Li, HKlein, GSun, PBuchan, AOBJECTIVE: Release of oxygen free radicals occurs following cerebral ischemia. Studies show that oxygen free radicals mediate ischemic brain injury. CoQ10 is a potent free radical scavenger and may offset brain injury associated with reperfusion. We tested exogeneous CoQ10 as a neuroprotectant in rats following both global and focal ischemic insults. METHODS: Rats were subjected to either 4-vessel occlusion ischemia (4-VO, 10 min occlusion, 7-day survival) or middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO, 120 min-occlusion, 22.5 h survival). Regional cerebral blood flows (rCBF) and physiological variables such as blood pressure, pO2, pCO2, plasma glucose and hematocrit were monitored and measured in focal ischemia. The animals were randomized to receive treatments of either phosphate buffered saline (PBS) vehicle or CoQ10 following global or focal ischemia. Injection times were at the end of ischemia and 3 h later for both models of ischemia. Histological outcomes are expressed as a percentage of hippocampal CA(1) cell injury in global ischemia or percentage of cortical infarct over that of non-ischemic hemisphere in focal ischemia. RESULTS: In global ischemia, animals treated with PBS vehicle and CoQ10 had 86+/-5% (n=8) and 83+/-10% (n=8), respectively, of hippocampal CA(1) cell injury (P>0.05). The percentage of infarct volumes in animals following focal ischemia were 23+/-9% (control, n=10) and 25+/-9% (CoQ10, n=10). There were no temperature or physiological differences between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Acute treatment with CoQ10 via intraperitoneal injection does not prevent neuronal injuries following global and focal ischemia. |
| spellingShingle | Li, H Klein, G Sun, P Buchan, A CoQ10 fails to protect brain against focal and global ischemia in rats. |
| title | CoQ10 fails to protect brain against focal and global ischemia in rats. |
| title_full | CoQ10 fails to protect brain against focal and global ischemia in rats. |
| title_fullStr | CoQ10 fails to protect brain against focal and global ischemia in rats. |
| title_full_unstemmed | CoQ10 fails to protect brain against focal and global ischemia in rats. |
| title_short | CoQ10 fails to protect brain against focal and global ischemia in rats. |
| title_sort | coq10 fails to protect brain against focal and global ischemia in rats |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lih coq10failstoprotectbrainagainstfocalandglobalischemiainrats AT kleing coq10failstoprotectbrainagainstfocalandglobalischemiainrats AT sunp coq10failstoprotectbrainagainstfocalandglobalischemiainrats AT buchana coq10failstoprotectbrainagainstfocalandglobalischemiainrats |