Beyond sacrificial harm: a two dimensional model of utilitarian decision-making
Recent research has relied on ‘trolley’ type sacrificial moral dilemmas to study ‘utilitarian’ vs. ‘non-utilitarian’ modes of moral decision-making. This approach has generated important insights into people’s willingness to endorse instrumental harm in certain circumstances—typically, sacrificing o...
Main Authors: | Kahane, G, Everett, J, Earp, B, Caviola, L, Faber, N, Crockett, M, Savulescu, J |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Published: |
American Psychological Association
2017
|
Similar Items
-
Beyond sacrificial harm: A two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology
by: Kahane, G, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Utilitarianism for animals, Kantianism for people? Harming animals and humans for the greater good
by: Caviola, L, et al.
Published: (2020) -
'Utilitarian' judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good.
by: Kahane, G, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Switching tracks? Towards a multi-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology
by: Everett, J, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment.
by: Kahane, G
Published: (2015)