The history of Greek "*πίφρημι"
After a survey of all the attestations, until Roman times, of the lexeme listed as either -πίφρημι or -φρέω in the reference dictionaries of Ancient Greek, it is argued that the conventional explanation of this verb, which revolves around the aorist of προ-ίημι, needs to be revisited and refined. Co...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
2020
|
_version_ | 1797107166582145024 |
---|---|
author | Willi, A |
author_facet | Willi, A |
author_sort | Willi, A |
collection | OXFORD |
description | After a survey of all the attestations, until Roman times, of the lexeme listed as either -πίφρημι or -φρέω in the reference dictionaries of Ancient Greek, it is argued that the conventional explanation of this verb, which revolves around the aorist of προ-ίημι, needs to be revisited and refined. Contrary to widespread opinion, forms pointing to a present stem -φρεε/ο- and a sigmatic aorist are not to be dismissed as corrupt, secondary, or later than forms belonging to a κ-aorist. The pivot form of the entire system must have been the 1sg. aorist subjunctive, from where a new ‘stem’ containing the element -φρ-° first spread into the future; two parallel and competing aorist-stem and present-stem formations were then formed on this basis, with developments in both cases following predictable pathways of intraparadigmatic analogy but excluding a single line of descent. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T07:10:40Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:588854f2-1862-40e2-9b45-30c70ab250bc |
institution | University of Oxford |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T07:10:40Z |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:588854f2-1862-40e2-9b45-30c70ab250bc2022-06-27T16:49:42ZThe history of Greek "*πίφρημι"Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:588854f2-1862-40e2-9b45-30c70ab250bcEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordVandenhoeck & Ruprecht2020Willi, AAfter a survey of all the attestations, until Roman times, of the lexeme listed as either -πίφρημι or -φρέω in the reference dictionaries of Ancient Greek, it is argued that the conventional explanation of this verb, which revolves around the aorist of προ-ίημι, needs to be revisited and refined. Contrary to widespread opinion, forms pointing to a present stem -φρεε/ο- and a sigmatic aorist are not to be dismissed as corrupt, secondary, or later than forms belonging to a κ-aorist. The pivot form of the entire system must have been the 1sg. aorist subjunctive, from where a new ‘stem’ containing the element -φρ-° first spread into the future; two parallel and competing aorist-stem and present-stem formations were then formed on this basis, with developments in both cases following predictable pathways of intraparadigmatic analogy but excluding a single line of descent. |
spellingShingle | Willi, A The history of Greek "*πίφρημι" |
title | The history of Greek "*πίφρημι" |
title_full | The history of Greek "*πίφρημι" |
title_fullStr | The history of Greek "*πίφρημι" |
title_full_unstemmed | The history of Greek "*πίφρημι" |
title_short | The history of Greek "*πίφρημι" |
title_sort | history of greek πίφρημι |
work_keys_str_mv | AT willia thehistoryofgreekpiphrēmi AT willia historyofgreekpiphrēmi |