Did the reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers improve since the introduction of REMARK guideline? A comparison of reporting in published articles
Although biomarkers are perceived as highly relevant for future clinical practice, few biomarkers reach clinical utility for several reasons. Among them, poor reporting of studies is one of the major problems. To aid improvement, reporting guidelines like REMARK for tumour marker prognostic (TMP) st...
Main Authors: | Sekula, P, Mallett, S, Altman, D, Sauerbrei, W |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Published: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Similar Items
-
Reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers: a review of published articles in relation to REMARK guidelines.
by: Mallett, S, et al.
Published: (2010) -
Reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers: a review of published articles in relation to REMARK guidelines
by: Mallett, S, et al.
Published: (2010) -
REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK).
by: McShane, L, et al.
Published: (2005) -
REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK).
by: McShane, L, et al.
Published: (2005) -
Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK).
by: McShane, L, et al.
Published: (2005)