Did the reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers improve since the introduction of REMARK guideline? A comparison of reporting in published articles
Although biomarkers are perceived as highly relevant for future clinical practice, few biomarkers reach clinical utility for several reasons. Among them, poor reporting of studies is one of the major problems. To aid improvement, reporting guidelines like REMARK for tumour marker prognostic (TMP) st...
Main Authors: | Sekula, P, Mallett, S, Altman, D, Sauerbrei, W |
---|---|
Formato: | Journal article |
Publicado em: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Registos relacionados
-
Did the reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers improve since the introduction of REMARK guideline? A comparison of reporting in published articles.
Por: Peggy Sekula, et al.
Publicado em: (2017-01-01) -
Reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers: a review of published articles in relation to REMARK guidelines
Por: Mallett, S, et al.
Publicado em: (2010) -
Reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers: a review of published articles in relation to REMARK guidelines.
Por: Mallett, S, et al.
Publicado em: (2010) -
REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK).
Por: McShane, L, et al.
Publicado em: (2005) -
Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK).
Por: McShane, L, et al.
Publicado em: (2005)