The future of the UK IPO

IPOs have long played a central role in how most companies go public, but the dominance of classic IPO models in UK markets has been significantly threatened over the last two decades. Companies are ever more reluctant to go public—and those that do so increasingly gravitate towards methods that ref...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Payne, J, Martins Pereira, C
Other Authors: Chiu, I
Format: Book section
Language:English
Published: Edward Elgar Publishing 2023
_version_ 1797169948696510464
author Payne, J
Martins Pereira, C
author2 Chiu, I
author_facet Chiu, I
Payne, J
Martins Pereira, C
author_sort Payne, J
collection OXFORD
description IPOs have long played a central role in how most companies go public, but the dominance of classic IPO models in UK markets has been significantly threatened over the last two decades. Companies are ever more reluctant to go public—and those that do so increasingly gravitate towards methods that reformulate or entirely depart from traditional IPO structures. The UK’s exit from the EU on 31 December 2020, which removed the requirement to follow EU regulations, has provided the UK with the opportunity to assess whether its rules still offer the right regulatory regime for IPOs. This paper examines what the right balance for the UK IPO might be. First, it analyses how traditional IPO structures have been evolving in the UK; second, it considers how the development of alternative investment models has been impinging on the classic IPO model; finally, it examines the extent to which new and proposed regulatory changes have learned from these developments in order to strike a satisfactory regulatory balance between issuers and investors. Ultimately, it is argued that the changes to date are modest and stay largely within the confines of existing frameworks, despite the claims that they comprise a fundamental overhaul of the regime. Although some caution is desirable particularly where investor protection concerns arise, the limited nature of these changes means that the reforms to the UK regime may fail to achieve the much-needed revitalisation of the UK IPO.
first_indexed 2024-04-23T23:27:02Z
format Book section
id oxford-uuid:58caa12a-a542-4040-909c-418ebc6051f5
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-23T23:27:02Z
publishDate 2023
publisher Edward Elgar Publishing
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:58caa12a-a542-4040-909c-418ebc6051f52024-04-23T10:50:19ZThe future of the UK IPOBook sectionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248uuid:58caa12a-a542-4040-909c-418ebc6051f5EnglishSymplectic ElementsEdward Elgar Publishing2023Payne, JMartins Pereira, CChiu, IMacNeil, IIPOs have long played a central role in how most companies go public, but the dominance of classic IPO models in UK markets has been significantly threatened over the last two decades. Companies are ever more reluctant to go public—and those that do so increasingly gravitate towards methods that reformulate or entirely depart from traditional IPO structures. The UK’s exit from the EU on 31 December 2020, which removed the requirement to follow EU regulations, has provided the UK with the opportunity to assess whether its rules still offer the right regulatory regime for IPOs. This paper examines what the right balance for the UK IPO might be. First, it analyses how traditional IPO structures have been evolving in the UK; second, it considers how the development of alternative investment models has been impinging on the classic IPO model; finally, it examines the extent to which new and proposed regulatory changes have learned from these developments in order to strike a satisfactory regulatory balance between issuers and investors. Ultimately, it is argued that the changes to date are modest and stay largely within the confines of existing frameworks, despite the claims that they comprise a fundamental overhaul of the regime. Although some caution is desirable particularly where investor protection concerns arise, the limited nature of these changes means that the reforms to the UK regime may fail to achieve the much-needed revitalisation of the UK IPO.
spellingShingle Payne, J
Martins Pereira, C
The future of the UK IPO
title The future of the UK IPO
title_full The future of the UK IPO
title_fullStr The future of the UK IPO
title_full_unstemmed The future of the UK IPO
title_short The future of the UK IPO
title_sort future of the uk ipo
work_keys_str_mv AT paynej thefutureoftheukipo
AT martinspereirac thefutureoftheukipo
AT paynej futureoftheukipo
AT martinspereirac futureoftheukipo