Loss to follow-up matters.

Survival analysis of joint replacement relies on the assumption that surgical procedures in patients lost to follow-up have the same chance of failing as those in patients who continue to be assessed. Our study questions that assumption. During the 16-year follow-up of 2268 patients who had received...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Murray, D, Britton, A, Bulstrode, C
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 1997
_version_ 1797070058649812992
author Murray, D
Britton, A
Bulstrode, C
author_facet Murray, D
Britton, A
Bulstrode, C
author_sort Murray, D
collection OXFORD
description Survival analysis of joint replacement relies on the assumption that surgical procedures in patients lost to follow-up have the same chance of failing as those in patients who continue to be assessed. Our study questions that assumption. During the 16-year follow-up of 2268 patients who had received total hip replacements 142 (6%) were lost to follow-up. The cumulative loss at 15 years was 20%. At their last assessment, patients who subsequently failed to attend for follow-up had significantly worse pain, range of movement and opinion of their progress (p < 0.001) and significantly worse radiological features than a matched control group (p < 0.01). Patients lost to follow-up have a worse outcome than those who continue to be assessed. Consequently, a survival analysis that does not take into account such patients is likely to give falsely optimistic results. It is therefore essential that vigorous attempts are made to minimise loss to follow-up, and that the rate of such loss is quoted. The overall loss to follow-up disguises the magnitude of the problem, which is best quantified by a cumulative rate of follow-up. The reliability of a study can be assessed by a loss-to-follow-up quotient, calculated by the number of failures: the lower the quotient the more reliable the data. Ideally, the quotient should be less than 1.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:33:36Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:5918eabe-0c34-45d9-9fbc-1f00b2260584
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:33:36Z
publishDate 1997
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:5918eabe-0c34-45d9-9fbc-1f00b22605842022-03-26T17:07:51ZLoss to follow-up matters.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:5918eabe-0c34-45d9-9fbc-1f00b2260584EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford1997Murray, DBritton, ABulstrode, CSurvival analysis of joint replacement relies on the assumption that surgical procedures in patients lost to follow-up have the same chance of failing as those in patients who continue to be assessed. Our study questions that assumption. During the 16-year follow-up of 2268 patients who had received total hip replacements 142 (6%) were lost to follow-up. The cumulative loss at 15 years was 20%. At their last assessment, patients who subsequently failed to attend for follow-up had significantly worse pain, range of movement and opinion of their progress (p < 0.001) and significantly worse radiological features than a matched control group (p < 0.01). Patients lost to follow-up have a worse outcome than those who continue to be assessed. Consequently, a survival analysis that does not take into account such patients is likely to give falsely optimistic results. It is therefore essential that vigorous attempts are made to minimise loss to follow-up, and that the rate of such loss is quoted. The overall loss to follow-up disguises the magnitude of the problem, which is best quantified by a cumulative rate of follow-up. The reliability of a study can be assessed by a loss-to-follow-up quotient, calculated by the number of failures: the lower the quotient the more reliable the data. Ideally, the quotient should be less than 1.
spellingShingle Murray, D
Britton, A
Bulstrode, C
Loss to follow-up matters.
title Loss to follow-up matters.
title_full Loss to follow-up matters.
title_fullStr Loss to follow-up matters.
title_full_unstemmed Loss to follow-up matters.
title_short Loss to follow-up matters.
title_sort loss to follow up matters
work_keys_str_mv AT murrayd losstofollowupmatters
AT brittona losstofollowupmatters
AT bulstrodec losstofollowupmatters