Values-led conservation

In international nature conservation policy, value-arguments based on science and economic rationalism increasingly overshadow the aesthetic and ethical arguments that originally inspired the conservation movement. We argue that this trend risks removing conservation from the public realm, in part b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jepson, P, Canney, S
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2003
Subjects:
_version_ 1797070132285014016
author Jepson, P
Canney, S
author_facet Jepson, P
Canney, S
author_sort Jepson, P
collection OXFORD
description In international nature conservation policy, value-arguments based on science and economic rationalism increasingly overshadow the aesthetic and ethical arguments that originally inspired the conservation movement. We argue that this trend risks removing conservation from the public realm, in part because it facilitates the adoption by nongovernment conservation bodies of corporate values and/or their integration with government bureaucracies. By contrast, the explicit recognition of aesthetic and ethical values would complement arguments based on science and economic utility. We subscribe to a reformist view of globalization that accepts the inevitability of a globalizing world but argues that the process needs humanizing by incorporating quality of life values in the policy process. We argue that re-emphasis of aesthetic and ethical arguments in international conservation policy would contribute to this goal by reasserting links between conservation bodies and the public, thereby leading to more effective action on the ground.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:34:42Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:597c7b52-df4e-428a-9374-3fedadb7d08f
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:34:42Z
publishDate 2003
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:597c7b52-df4e-428a-9374-3fedadb7d08f2022-03-26T17:10:01ZValues-led conservationJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:597c7b52-df4e-428a-9374-3fedadb7d08fBiodiversityEnvironmentGeographyZoological sciencesEnglishOxford University Research Archive - ValetBlackwell Publishing Ltd.2003Jepson, PCanney, SIn international nature conservation policy, value-arguments based on science and economic rationalism increasingly overshadow the aesthetic and ethical arguments that originally inspired the conservation movement. We argue that this trend risks removing conservation from the public realm, in part because it facilitates the adoption by nongovernment conservation bodies of corporate values and/or their integration with government bureaucracies. By contrast, the explicit recognition of aesthetic and ethical values would complement arguments based on science and economic utility. We subscribe to a reformist view of globalization that accepts the inevitability of a globalizing world but argues that the process needs humanizing by incorporating quality of life values in the policy process. We argue that re-emphasis of aesthetic and ethical arguments in international conservation policy would contribute to this goal by reasserting links between conservation bodies and the public, thereby leading to more effective action on the ground.
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Environment
Geography
Zoological sciences
Jepson, P
Canney, S
Values-led conservation
title Values-led conservation
title_full Values-led conservation
title_fullStr Values-led conservation
title_full_unstemmed Values-led conservation
title_short Values-led conservation
title_sort values led conservation
topic Biodiversity
Environment
Geography
Zoological sciences
work_keys_str_mv AT jepsonp valuesledconservation
AT canneys valuesledconservation