A home-based rehabilitation programme compared with traditional physiotherapy for patients at risk of poor outcome after knee arthroplasty: the CORKA randomised controlled trial

<br><strong>Objectives </strong>To evaluate whether a home-based rehabilitation programme for people assessed as being at risk of a poor outcome after knee arthroplasty offers superior outcomes to traditional outpatient physiotherapy. <br><strong> Design</strong>...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barker, KL, Room, J, Knight, R, Dutton, S, Toye, F, Leal, J, Collins, G, Schlussel, Beard, D, Price, A, Lamb, S, Barker, K
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
_version_ 1797070229154562048
author Barker, KL
Room, J
Knight, R
Dutton, S
Toye, F
Leal, J
Collins, G
Schlussel
Beard, D
Price, A
Lamb, S
Barker, K
author_facet Barker, KL
Room, J
Knight, R
Dutton, S
Toye, F
Leal, J
Collins, G
Schlussel
Beard, D
Price, A
Lamb, S
Barker, K
author_sort Barker, KL
collection OXFORD
description <br><strong>Objectives </strong>To evaluate whether a home-based rehabilitation programme for people assessed as being at risk of a poor outcome after knee arthroplasty offers superior outcomes to traditional outpatient physiotherapy. <br><strong> Design</strong> A prospective, single-blind, two-arm randomised controlled superiority trial. <br><strong> Setting </strong>14 National Health Service physiotherapy departments in the UK. <br><strong> Participants </strong>621 participants identified at high risk of a poor outcome after knee arthroplasty using a bespoke screening tool. <br><strong> Interventions </strong>A multicomponent home-based rehabilitation programme delivered by rehabilitation assistants with supervision from qualified therapists versus usual care outpatient physiotherapy. <br><strong> Main outcome measures </strong>The primary outcome was the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were the Oxford Knee Score (a disease-specific measure of function), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Quality of Life subscale, Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly, 5 dimension, 5 level version of Euroqol (EQ-5D-5L) and physical function assessed using the Figure of 8 Walk test, 30 s Chair Stand Test and Single Leg Stance. <br><strong> Results </strong>621 participants were randomised between March 2015 and January 2018. 309 were assigned to CORKA (Community Rehabilitation after Knee Arthroplasty) home-based rehabilitation, receiving a median five treatment sessions (IQR 4–7). 312 were assigned to usual care, receiving a median 4 sessions (IQR 2–6). The primary outcome, LLFDI function total score at 12 months, was collected for 279 participants (89%) in the home-based CORKA group and 287 participants (92%) in the usual care group. No clinically or statistically significant difference was found between the groups (intention-to-treat adjusted difference=0.49 points; 95% CI −0.89 to 1.88; p=0.48). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups on any of the patient-reported or physical secondary outcome measures at 6 or 12 months. <br> There were 18 participants in the intervention group reporting a serious adverse event (5.8%), only one directly related to the intervention, all other adverse events recorded throughout the trial related to underlying chronic medical conditions. <br><strong> Conclusions </strong>The CORKA intervention was not superior to usual care. The trial detected no significant differences, clinical or statistical, between the two groups on either primary or secondary outcomes. CORKA offers an evaluation of an intervention utilising a different service delivery model for this patient group. <br><strong> Trial registration number</strong> ISRCTN13517704.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:35:55Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:59e30fcb-7774-4fdf-b600-7f1c73ec2198
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:35:55Z
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:59e30fcb-7774-4fdf-b600-7f1c73ec21982022-03-26T17:12:29ZA home-based rehabilitation programme compared with traditional physiotherapy for patients at risk of poor outcome after knee arthroplasty: the CORKA randomised controlled trialJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:59e30fcb-7774-4fdf-b600-7f1c73ec2198EnglishSymplectic ElementsBMJ Publishing Group2021Barker, KLRoom, JKnight, RDutton, SToye, FLeal, JCollins, GSchlusselBeard, DPrice, ALamb, SBarker, K<br><strong>Objectives </strong>To evaluate whether a home-based rehabilitation programme for people assessed as being at risk of a poor outcome after knee arthroplasty offers superior outcomes to traditional outpatient physiotherapy. <br><strong> Design</strong> A prospective, single-blind, two-arm randomised controlled superiority trial. <br><strong> Setting </strong>14 National Health Service physiotherapy departments in the UK. <br><strong> Participants </strong>621 participants identified at high risk of a poor outcome after knee arthroplasty using a bespoke screening tool. <br><strong> Interventions </strong>A multicomponent home-based rehabilitation programme delivered by rehabilitation assistants with supervision from qualified therapists versus usual care outpatient physiotherapy. <br><strong> Main outcome measures </strong>The primary outcome was the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were the Oxford Knee Score (a disease-specific measure of function), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Quality of Life subscale, Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly, 5 dimension, 5 level version of Euroqol (EQ-5D-5L) and physical function assessed using the Figure of 8 Walk test, 30 s Chair Stand Test and Single Leg Stance. <br><strong> Results </strong>621 participants were randomised between March 2015 and January 2018. 309 were assigned to CORKA (Community Rehabilitation after Knee Arthroplasty) home-based rehabilitation, receiving a median five treatment sessions (IQR 4–7). 312 were assigned to usual care, receiving a median 4 sessions (IQR 2–6). The primary outcome, LLFDI function total score at 12 months, was collected for 279 participants (89%) in the home-based CORKA group and 287 participants (92%) in the usual care group. No clinically or statistically significant difference was found between the groups (intention-to-treat adjusted difference=0.49 points; 95% CI −0.89 to 1.88; p=0.48). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups on any of the patient-reported or physical secondary outcome measures at 6 or 12 months. <br> There were 18 participants in the intervention group reporting a serious adverse event (5.8%), only one directly related to the intervention, all other adverse events recorded throughout the trial related to underlying chronic medical conditions. <br><strong> Conclusions </strong>The CORKA intervention was not superior to usual care. The trial detected no significant differences, clinical or statistical, between the two groups on either primary or secondary outcomes. CORKA offers an evaluation of an intervention utilising a different service delivery model for this patient group. <br><strong> Trial registration number</strong> ISRCTN13517704.
spellingShingle Barker, KL
Room, J
Knight, R
Dutton, S
Toye, F
Leal, J
Collins, G
Schlussel
Beard, D
Price, A
Lamb, S
Barker, K
A home-based rehabilitation programme compared with traditional physiotherapy for patients at risk of poor outcome after knee arthroplasty: the CORKA randomised controlled trial
title A home-based rehabilitation programme compared with traditional physiotherapy for patients at risk of poor outcome after knee arthroplasty: the CORKA randomised controlled trial
title_full A home-based rehabilitation programme compared with traditional physiotherapy for patients at risk of poor outcome after knee arthroplasty: the CORKA randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr A home-based rehabilitation programme compared with traditional physiotherapy for patients at risk of poor outcome after knee arthroplasty: the CORKA randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed A home-based rehabilitation programme compared with traditional physiotherapy for patients at risk of poor outcome after knee arthroplasty: the CORKA randomised controlled trial
title_short A home-based rehabilitation programme compared with traditional physiotherapy for patients at risk of poor outcome after knee arthroplasty: the CORKA randomised controlled trial
title_sort home based rehabilitation programme compared with traditional physiotherapy for patients at risk of poor outcome after knee arthroplasty the corka randomised controlled trial
work_keys_str_mv AT barkerkl ahomebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT roomj ahomebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT knightr ahomebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT duttons ahomebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT toyef ahomebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lealj ahomebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT collinsg ahomebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schlussel ahomebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT beardd ahomebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pricea ahomebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lambs ahomebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT barkerk ahomebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT barkerkl homebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT roomj homebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT knightr homebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT duttons homebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT toyef homebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lealj homebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT collinsg homebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schlussel homebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT beardd homebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pricea homebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lambs homebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT barkerk homebasedrehabilitationprogrammecomparedwithtraditionalphysiotherapyforpatientsatriskofpooroutcomeafterkneearthroplastythecorkarandomisedcontrolledtrial