Sex differences in left-handedness: a meta-analysis of 144 studies.

Human handedness, a marker for language lateralization in the brain, continues to attract great research interest. A widely reported but not universal finding is a greater male tendency toward left-handedness. Here the authors present a meta-analysis of k = 144 studies, totaling N = 1,787,629 partic...

Ful tanımlama

Detaylı Bibliyografya
Asıl Yazarlar: Papadatou-Pastou, M, Martin, M, Munafò, MR, Jones, G
Materyal Türü: Journal article
Dil:English
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: 2008
_version_ 1826274108876259328
author Papadatou-Pastou, M
Martin, M
Munafò, MR
Jones, G
author_facet Papadatou-Pastou, M
Martin, M
Munafò, MR
Jones, G
author_sort Papadatou-Pastou, M
collection OXFORD
description Human handedness, a marker for language lateralization in the brain, continues to attract great research interest. A widely reported but not universal finding is a greater male tendency toward left-handedness. Here the authors present a meta-analysis of k = 144 studies, totaling N = 1,787,629 participants, the results of which demonstrate that the sex difference is both significant and robust. The overall best estimate for the male to female odds ratio was 1.23 (95% confidence interval = 1.19, 1.27). The widespread observation of this sex difference is consistent with it being related to innate characteristics of sexual differentiation, and its observed magnitude places an important constraint on current theories of handedness. In addition, the size of the sex difference was significantly moderated by the way in which handedness was assessed (by writing hand or by other means), the location of testing, and the year of publication of the study, implicating additional influences on its development.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:38:26Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:5ab80d1a-28b8-4bf8-9cc3-9e81c2be7639
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:38:26Z
publishDate 2008
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:5ab80d1a-28b8-4bf8-9cc3-9e81c2be76392022-03-26T17:17:29ZSex differences in left-handedness: a meta-analysis of 144 studies.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:5ab80d1a-28b8-4bf8-9cc3-9e81c2be7639EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2008Papadatou-Pastou, MMartin, MMunafò, MRJones, GHuman handedness, a marker for language lateralization in the brain, continues to attract great research interest. A widely reported but not universal finding is a greater male tendency toward left-handedness. Here the authors present a meta-analysis of k = 144 studies, totaling N = 1,787,629 participants, the results of which demonstrate that the sex difference is both significant and robust. The overall best estimate for the male to female odds ratio was 1.23 (95% confidence interval = 1.19, 1.27). The widespread observation of this sex difference is consistent with it being related to innate characteristics of sexual differentiation, and its observed magnitude places an important constraint on current theories of handedness. In addition, the size of the sex difference was significantly moderated by the way in which handedness was assessed (by writing hand or by other means), the location of testing, and the year of publication of the study, implicating additional influences on its development.
spellingShingle Papadatou-Pastou, M
Martin, M
Munafò, MR
Jones, G
Sex differences in left-handedness: a meta-analysis of 144 studies.
title Sex differences in left-handedness: a meta-analysis of 144 studies.
title_full Sex differences in left-handedness: a meta-analysis of 144 studies.
title_fullStr Sex differences in left-handedness: a meta-analysis of 144 studies.
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in left-handedness: a meta-analysis of 144 studies.
title_short Sex differences in left-handedness: a meta-analysis of 144 studies.
title_sort sex differences in left handedness a meta analysis of 144 studies
work_keys_str_mv AT papadatoupastoum sexdifferencesinlefthandednessametaanalysisof144studies
AT martinm sexdifferencesinlefthandednessametaanalysisof144studies
AT munafomr sexdifferencesinlefthandednessametaanalysisof144studies
AT jonesg sexdifferencesinlefthandednessametaanalysisof144studies