Harmonization of large-scale, heterogeneous individual participant adverse event data from randomized trials of statin therapy

<p><strong>Background:</strong> Meta-analyses of individual-level data from randomized trials are often required to detect clinically worthwhile effects. The Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration, which includes data from numerous large long-term statin trials, is conduct...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emberson, J, Spata, E, Blackwell, L, Davies, K, Halls, H, Harper, C, Roddick, A, Samuel, N, Stevens, W, Wallendszus, K, Preiss, D, Collins, R, Baigent, C, Reith, C
Other Authors: Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 2022
_version_ 1797108405566963712
author Emberson, J
Spata, E
Blackwell, L
Davies, K
Halls, H
Harper, C
Roddick, A
Samuel, N
Stevens, W
Wallendszus, K
Preiss, D
Collins, R
Baigent, C
Reith, C
author2 Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration
author_facet Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration
Emberson, J
Spata, E
Blackwell, L
Davies, K
Halls, H
Harper, C
Roddick, A
Samuel, N
Stevens, W
Wallendszus, K
Preiss, D
Collins, R
Baigent, C
Reith, C
author_sort Emberson, J
collection OXFORD
description <p><strong>Background:</strong> Meta-analyses of individual-level data from randomized trials are often required to detect clinically worthwhile effects. The Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration, which includes data from numerous large long-term statin trials, is conducting a review of the effects of statin therapy on all adverse events collected in those trials. This paper describes the approaches used and challenges faced to systematically capture and categorise the data.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> Protocols, statistical analysis plans, case report forms, clinical study reports and data sets were obtained, reviewed and checked. Relevant baseline and follow-up data from each trial was then reorganised into standardised formats based upon the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium Study Data Tabulation Model (CDISC SDTM). Adverse event data were organised and coded (automatically or, where necessary, manually) according to a common medical dictionary based upon the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA).</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> Data from 23 double-blind statin trials and 5 open-label statin trials were provided, either through direct data transfer or through online access portals. Together, these trials provided 845 datasets containing over 38 million records relating to 30,495 study variables and 181,973 randomized patients. Of the 46 CDISC SDTM domains that could potentially have been used to organise the data, the 13 most relevant to the project were identified and utilised, including 6 domains related to post-randomization adverse events. Nearly 1.2 million adverse events were extracted and mapped to over 45,000 unique adverse event terms. Of these adverse events, 99% were coded to a MedDRA ‘lower level term’, with the remainder coded to a ‘higher level term’ or, very rarely, only a ‘higher level group term’.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> In this meta-analysis of adverse event data from the large randomized trials of statins, approaches based on common standards for data organisation and classification have provided a resource capable of allowing reliable and rapid evaluation of any previously-unknown benefits or hazards of statin therapy.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:28:45Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:5bb8b207-1360-43e8-bd4b-fc33e5d52161
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:28:45Z
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:5bb8b207-1360-43e8-bd4b-fc33e5d521612022-12-19T08:56:04ZHarmonization of large-scale, heterogeneous individual participant adverse event data from randomized trials of statin therapyJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:5bb8b207-1360-43e8-bd4b-fc33e5d52161EnglishSymplectic ElementsSAGE Publications2022Emberson, JSpata, EBlackwell, LDavies, KHalls, HHarper, CRoddick, ASamuel, NStevens, WWallendszus, KPreiss, DCollins, RBaigent, CReith, CCholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration<p><strong>Background:</strong> Meta-analyses of individual-level data from randomized trials are often required to detect clinically worthwhile effects. The Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration, which includes data from numerous large long-term statin trials, is conducting a review of the effects of statin therapy on all adverse events collected in those trials. This paper describes the approaches used and challenges faced to systematically capture and categorise the data.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> Protocols, statistical analysis plans, case report forms, clinical study reports and data sets were obtained, reviewed and checked. Relevant baseline and follow-up data from each trial was then reorganised into standardised formats based upon the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium Study Data Tabulation Model (CDISC SDTM). Adverse event data were organised and coded (automatically or, where necessary, manually) according to a common medical dictionary based upon the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA).</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> Data from 23 double-blind statin trials and 5 open-label statin trials were provided, either through direct data transfer or through online access portals. Together, these trials provided 845 datasets containing over 38 million records relating to 30,495 study variables and 181,973 randomized patients. Of the 46 CDISC SDTM domains that could potentially have been used to organise the data, the 13 most relevant to the project were identified and utilised, including 6 domains related to post-randomization adverse events. Nearly 1.2 million adverse events were extracted and mapped to over 45,000 unique adverse event terms. Of these adverse events, 99% were coded to a MedDRA ‘lower level term’, with the remainder coded to a ‘higher level term’ or, very rarely, only a ‘higher level group term’.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> In this meta-analysis of adverse event data from the large randomized trials of statins, approaches based on common standards for data organisation and classification have provided a resource capable of allowing reliable and rapid evaluation of any previously-unknown benefits or hazards of statin therapy.</p>
spellingShingle Emberson, J
Spata, E
Blackwell, L
Davies, K
Halls, H
Harper, C
Roddick, A
Samuel, N
Stevens, W
Wallendszus, K
Preiss, D
Collins, R
Baigent, C
Reith, C
Harmonization of large-scale, heterogeneous individual participant adverse event data from randomized trials of statin therapy
title Harmonization of large-scale, heterogeneous individual participant adverse event data from randomized trials of statin therapy
title_full Harmonization of large-scale, heterogeneous individual participant adverse event data from randomized trials of statin therapy
title_fullStr Harmonization of large-scale, heterogeneous individual participant adverse event data from randomized trials of statin therapy
title_full_unstemmed Harmonization of large-scale, heterogeneous individual participant adverse event data from randomized trials of statin therapy
title_short Harmonization of large-scale, heterogeneous individual participant adverse event data from randomized trials of statin therapy
title_sort harmonization of large scale heterogeneous individual participant adverse event data from randomized trials of statin therapy
work_keys_str_mv AT embersonj harmonizationoflargescaleheterogeneousindividualparticipantadverseeventdatafromrandomizedtrialsofstatintherapy
AT spatae harmonizationoflargescaleheterogeneousindividualparticipantadverseeventdatafromrandomizedtrialsofstatintherapy
AT blackwelll harmonizationoflargescaleheterogeneousindividualparticipantadverseeventdatafromrandomizedtrialsofstatintherapy
AT daviesk harmonizationoflargescaleheterogeneousindividualparticipantadverseeventdatafromrandomizedtrialsofstatintherapy
AT hallsh harmonizationoflargescaleheterogeneousindividualparticipantadverseeventdatafromrandomizedtrialsofstatintherapy
AT harperc harmonizationoflargescaleheterogeneousindividualparticipantadverseeventdatafromrandomizedtrialsofstatintherapy
AT roddicka harmonizationoflargescaleheterogeneousindividualparticipantadverseeventdatafromrandomizedtrialsofstatintherapy
AT samueln harmonizationoflargescaleheterogeneousindividualparticipantadverseeventdatafromrandomizedtrialsofstatintherapy
AT stevensw harmonizationoflargescaleheterogeneousindividualparticipantadverseeventdatafromrandomizedtrialsofstatintherapy
AT wallendszusk harmonizationoflargescaleheterogeneousindividualparticipantadverseeventdatafromrandomizedtrialsofstatintherapy
AT preissd harmonizationoflargescaleheterogeneousindividualparticipantadverseeventdatafromrandomizedtrialsofstatintherapy
AT collinsr harmonizationoflargescaleheterogeneousindividualparticipantadverseeventdatafromrandomizedtrialsofstatintherapy
AT baigentc harmonizationoflargescaleheterogeneousindividualparticipantadverseeventdatafromrandomizedtrialsofstatintherapy
AT reithc harmonizationoflargescaleheterogeneousindividualparticipantadverseeventdatafromrandomizedtrialsofstatintherapy