In defence of just war: Christian tradition, controversies, and cases

This article presents four controversial issues that are raised by the articulation of just war thinking in my book, In Defence of War (2013, 2014): the conception of just war as punitive, the penultimate nature of the authority of international law, the morality of national interest, and the elasti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Biggar, N
Format: Journal article
Published: Linköping University Electronic Press 2015
_version_ 1826274383749971968
author Biggar, N
author_facet Biggar, N
author_sort Biggar, N
collection OXFORD
description This article presents four controversial issues that are raised by the articulation of just war thinking in my book, In Defence of War (2013, 2014): the conception of just war as punitive, the penultimate nature of the authority of international law, the morality of national interest, and the elasticity of the requirement of proportionality. It then proceeds to illustrate the interpretation of some of the criteria of just war in terms of three topical cases: Britain’s belligerency against Germany in 1914, the Syrian rebellion against the Assad regime in 2011, and Israe’s Operation Protective Edge against Hamas in Gaza in 2013. It is often claimed that just war thinking has been rendered obsolete by novel phenomena such as nuclear weapons, wars ‘among the people’, war-by-remote-control, and cyber-aggression. The presentation of issues and cases in this article, notwithstanding its brevity, is sufficient to show that just war thinking continues to develop by wrestling with controversial conceptual problems and thinking its way through novel sets of circumstances.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:42:37Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:5c179f56-45e2-4a3d-9b3a-792a52cc545d
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:42:37Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Linköping University Electronic Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:5c179f56-45e2-4a3d-9b3a-792a52cc545d2022-03-26T17:26:07ZIn defence of just war: Christian tradition, controversies, and casesJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:5c179f56-45e2-4a3d-9b3a-792a52cc545dSymplectic Elements at OxfordLinköping University Electronic Press2015Biggar, NThis article presents four controversial issues that are raised by the articulation of just war thinking in my book, In Defence of War (2013, 2014): the conception of just war as punitive, the penultimate nature of the authority of international law, the morality of national interest, and the elasticity of the requirement of proportionality. It then proceeds to illustrate the interpretation of some of the criteria of just war in terms of three topical cases: Britain’s belligerency against Germany in 1914, the Syrian rebellion against the Assad regime in 2011, and Israe’s Operation Protective Edge against Hamas in Gaza in 2013. It is often claimed that just war thinking has been rendered obsolete by novel phenomena such as nuclear weapons, wars ‘among the people’, war-by-remote-control, and cyber-aggression. The presentation of issues and cases in this article, notwithstanding its brevity, is sufficient to show that just war thinking continues to develop by wrestling with controversial conceptual problems and thinking its way through novel sets of circumstances.
spellingShingle Biggar, N
In defence of just war: Christian tradition, controversies, and cases
title In defence of just war: Christian tradition, controversies, and cases
title_full In defence of just war: Christian tradition, controversies, and cases
title_fullStr In defence of just war: Christian tradition, controversies, and cases
title_full_unstemmed In defence of just war: Christian tradition, controversies, and cases
title_short In defence of just war: Christian tradition, controversies, and cases
title_sort in defence of just war christian tradition controversies and cases
work_keys_str_mv AT biggarn indefenceofjustwarchristiantraditioncontroversiesandcases