New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants

Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) have requested guidance on common greenhouse gas metrics in accounting for Nationally determined contributions (NDCs) to emission reductions1. Metric choice can affect the relative emphasis placed on reductions of ‘cumulat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Allen, MR, Fuglestvedt, JS, Shine, KP, Reisinger, A, Pierrehumbert, R, Forster, PM
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2016
_version_ 1826317510630178816
author Allen, MR
Fuglestvedt, JS
Shine, KP
Reisinger, A
Pierrehumbert, R
Forster, PM
author_facet Allen, MR
Fuglestvedt, JS
Shine, KP
Reisinger, A
Pierrehumbert, R
Forster, PM
author_sort Allen, MR
collection OXFORD
description Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) have requested guidance on common greenhouse gas metrics in accounting for Nationally determined contributions (NDCs) to emission reductions1. Metric choice can affect the relative emphasis placed on reductions of ‘cumulative climate pollutants’ such as carbon dioxide versus ‘short-lived climate pollutants’ (SLCPs), including methane and black carbon2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Here we show that the widely used 100-year global warming potential (GWP100) effectively measures the relative impact of both cumulative pollutants and SLCPs on realized warming 20–40 years after the time of emission. If the overall goal of climate policy is to limit peak warming, GWP100 therefore overstates the importance of current SLCP emissions unless stringent and immediate reductions of all climate pollutants result in temperatures nearing their peak soon after mid-century7, 8, 9, 10, which may be necessary to limit warming to “well below 2 °C” (ref. 1). The GWP100 can be used to approximately equate a one-off pulse emission of a cumulative pollutant and an indefinitely sustained change in the rate of emission of an SLCP11, 12, 13. The climate implications of traditional CO2-equivalent targets are ambiguous unless contributions from cumulative pollutants and SLCPs are specified separately.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:45:12Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:5ceebac6-a19a-4f44-9741-e5a6e736468e
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2025-02-19T04:40:29Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:5ceebac6-a19a-4f44-9741-e5a6e736468e2025-02-18T17:47:34ZNew use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutantsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:5ceebac6-a19a-4f44-9741-e5a6e736468eEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordNature Publishing Group2016Allen, MRFuglestvedt, JSShine, KPReisinger, APierrehumbert, RForster, PMParties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) have requested guidance on common greenhouse gas metrics in accounting for Nationally determined contributions (NDCs) to emission reductions1. Metric choice can affect the relative emphasis placed on reductions of ‘cumulative climate pollutants’ such as carbon dioxide versus ‘short-lived climate pollutants’ (SLCPs), including methane and black carbon2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Here we show that the widely used 100-year global warming potential (GWP100) effectively measures the relative impact of both cumulative pollutants and SLCPs on realized warming 20–40 years after the time of emission. If the overall goal of climate policy is to limit peak warming, GWP100 therefore overstates the importance of current SLCP emissions unless stringent and immediate reductions of all climate pollutants result in temperatures nearing their peak soon after mid-century7, 8, 9, 10, which may be necessary to limit warming to “well below 2 °C” (ref. 1). The GWP100 can be used to approximately equate a one-off pulse emission of a cumulative pollutant and an indefinitely sustained change in the rate of emission of an SLCP11, 12, 13. The climate implications of traditional CO2-equivalent targets are ambiguous unless contributions from cumulative pollutants and SLCPs are specified separately.
spellingShingle Allen, MR
Fuglestvedt, JS
Shine, KP
Reisinger, A
Pierrehumbert, R
Forster, PM
New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants
title New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants
title_full New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants
title_fullStr New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants
title_full_unstemmed New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants
title_short New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants
title_sort new use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short lived climate pollutants
work_keys_str_mv AT allenmr newuseofglobalwarmingpotentialstocomparecumulativeandshortlivedclimatepollutants
AT fuglestvedtjs newuseofglobalwarmingpotentialstocomparecumulativeandshortlivedclimatepollutants
AT shinekp newuseofglobalwarmingpotentialstocomparecumulativeandshortlivedclimatepollutants
AT reisingera newuseofglobalwarmingpotentialstocomparecumulativeandshortlivedclimatepollutants
AT pierrehumbertr newuseofglobalwarmingpotentialstocomparecumulativeandshortlivedclimatepollutants
AT forsterpm newuseofglobalwarmingpotentialstocomparecumulativeandshortlivedclimatepollutants