Mutations within lncRNAs are effectively selected against in fruitfly but not in human.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies in Drosophila and mammals have revealed levels of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) sequence conservation that are intermediate between neutrally evolving and protein-coding sequence. These analyses compared conservation between species that diverged up to 75 million years...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haerty, W, Ponting, C
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2013
_version_ 1797070915122495488
author Haerty, W
Ponting, C
author_facet Haerty, W
Ponting, C
author_sort Haerty, W
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies in Drosophila and mammals have revealed levels of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) sequence conservation that are intermediate between neutrally evolving and protein-coding sequence. These analyses compared conservation between species that diverged up to 75 million years ago. However, analysis of sequence polymorphisms within a species' population can provide an understanding of essentially contemporaneous selective constraints that are acting on lncRNAs and can quantify the deleterious effect of mutations occurring within these loci. RESULTS: We took advantage of polymorphisms derived from the genome sequences of 163 Drosophila melanogaster strains and 174 human individuals to calculate the distribution of fitness effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms occurring within intergenic lncRNAs and compared this to distributions for SNPs present within putatively neutral or protein-coding sequences. Our observations show that in D.melanogaster there is a significant excess of rare frequency variants within intergenic lncRNAs relative to neutrally evolving sequences, whereas selection on human intergenic lncRNAs appears to be effectively neutral. Approximately 30% of mutations within these fruitfly lncRNAs are estimated as being weakly deleterious. CONCLUSIONS: These contrasting results can be attributed to the large difference in effective population sizes between the two species. Our results suggest that while the sequences of lncRNAs will be well conserved across insect species, such loci in mammals will accumulate greater proportions of deleterious changes through genetic drift.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:45:53Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:5d29cdba-5a6c-4146-a66a-102391ed26e4
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:45:53Z
publishDate 2013
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:5d29cdba-5a6c-4146-a66a-102391ed26e42022-03-26T17:32:36ZMutations within lncRNAs are effectively selected against in fruitfly but not in human.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:5d29cdba-5a6c-4146-a66a-102391ed26e4EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2013Haerty, WPonting, CBACKGROUND: Previous studies in Drosophila and mammals have revealed levels of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) sequence conservation that are intermediate between neutrally evolving and protein-coding sequence. These analyses compared conservation between species that diverged up to 75 million years ago. However, analysis of sequence polymorphisms within a species' population can provide an understanding of essentially contemporaneous selective constraints that are acting on lncRNAs and can quantify the deleterious effect of mutations occurring within these loci. RESULTS: We took advantage of polymorphisms derived from the genome sequences of 163 Drosophila melanogaster strains and 174 human individuals to calculate the distribution of fitness effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms occurring within intergenic lncRNAs and compared this to distributions for SNPs present within putatively neutral or protein-coding sequences. Our observations show that in D.melanogaster there is a significant excess of rare frequency variants within intergenic lncRNAs relative to neutrally evolving sequences, whereas selection on human intergenic lncRNAs appears to be effectively neutral. Approximately 30% of mutations within these fruitfly lncRNAs are estimated as being weakly deleterious. CONCLUSIONS: These contrasting results can be attributed to the large difference in effective population sizes between the two species. Our results suggest that while the sequences of lncRNAs will be well conserved across insect species, such loci in mammals will accumulate greater proportions of deleterious changes through genetic drift.
spellingShingle Haerty, W
Ponting, C
Mutations within lncRNAs are effectively selected against in fruitfly but not in human.
title Mutations within lncRNAs are effectively selected against in fruitfly but not in human.
title_full Mutations within lncRNAs are effectively selected against in fruitfly but not in human.
title_fullStr Mutations within lncRNAs are effectively selected against in fruitfly but not in human.
title_full_unstemmed Mutations within lncRNAs are effectively selected against in fruitfly but not in human.
title_short Mutations within lncRNAs are effectively selected against in fruitfly but not in human.
title_sort mutations within lncrnas are effectively selected against in fruitfly but not in human
work_keys_str_mv AT haertyw mutationswithinlncrnasareeffectivelyselectedagainstinfruitflybutnotinhuman
AT pontingc mutationswithinlncrnasareeffectivelyselectedagainstinfruitflybutnotinhuman