The power of government to make contracts

<p>This thesis examines why the British central government can make contracts without statutory power. It argues that, to bear contractual rights, 'government' must be a legal person with legal personality extending to those rights. This constitutes a requirement for positive legal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Heaton, D
Other Authors: Davies, A
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
_version_ 1797071079579058176
author Heaton, D
author2 Davies, A
author_facet Davies, A
Heaton, D
author_sort Heaton, D
collection OXFORD
description <p>This thesis examines why the British central government can make contracts without statutory power. It argues that, to bear contractual rights, 'government' must be a legal person with legal personality extending to those rights. This constitutes a requirement for positive legal authorisation for government action with legal effect akin to that of natural persons' actions (including contracting). Further, government contracting power is subject to judicial review, which constrains the purposes and manner of its exercise. This makes wholesale comparisons with the contracting power of natural persons inappropriate.</p> <p>The thesis next examines and rejects two commonly advanced explanations of government contracting power: the 'third source' and 'the Crown' as corporation sole. The 'third source' theory — that government is free to act absent some prohibition — fails altogether to identify what legal person 'government' is and to explain the extent of its legal personality. The view that because it is a corporation sole 'the Crown' (here seen as a separate legal person from the Sovereign) has contracting power is also flawed: historical legal material suggests corporations sole were not separate legal persons and that the only legal effects of sole corporateness were property descending to the corporator’s successors (not heirs) and limits on dispositive power; for the Sovereign even this is doubtful in view of the prerogative.</p> <p>This thesis then argues that the best explanation of government contracting power is that the Sovereign is a natural person and, for that reason, has power to contract (subject to judicial review constraints). 'The Crown' simply means 'the Sovereign'; government officers act as her agents when placing contracts. This view has explicit Commonwealth and implicit English support in authority. Academic objections are unpersuasive. While further conceptual possibilities may exist, the natural person explanation of government contracting is conceptually coherent and best represents the law.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:48:03Z
format Thesis
id oxford-uuid:5ddef1e0-b30c-45bc-9182-5f9bd31ab4ce
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:48:03Z
publishDate 2015
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:5ddef1e0-b30c-45bc-9182-5f9bd31ab4ce2022-03-26T17:36:59ZThe power of government to make contractsThesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccuuid:5ddef1e0-b30c-45bc-9182-5f9bd31ab4ceContracts--GovernmentPrerogative, RoyalReview of government actionNon-statutory powerConstitutional lawEnglishORA Deposit2015Heaton, DDavies, AEndicott, TElliott, M<p>This thesis examines why the British central government can make contracts without statutory power. It argues that, to bear contractual rights, 'government' must be a legal person with legal personality extending to those rights. This constitutes a requirement for positive legal authorisation for government action with legal effect akin to that of natural persons' actions (including contracting). Further, government contracting power is subject to judicial review, which constrains the purposes and manner of its exercise. This makes wholesale comparisons with the contracting power of natural persons inappropriate.</p> <p>The thesis next examines and rejects two commonly advanced explanations of government contracting power: the 'third source' and 'the Crown' as corporation sole. The 'third source' theory — that government is free to act absent some prohibition — fails altogether to identify what legal person 'government' is and to explain the extent of its legal personality. The view that because it is a corporation sole 'the Crown' (here seen as a separate legal person from the Sovereign) has contracting power is also flawed: historical legal material suggests corporations sole were not separate legal persons and that the only legal effects of sole corporateness were property descending to the corporator’s successors (not heirs) and limits on dispositive power; for the Sovereign even this is doubtful in view of the prerogative.</p> <p>This thesis then argues that the best explanation of government contracting power is that the Sovereign is a natural person and, for that reason, has power to contract (subject to judicial review constraints). 'The Crown' simply means 'the Sovereign'; government officers act as her agents when placing contracts. This view has explicit Commonwealth and implicit English support in authority. Academic objections are unpersuasive. While further conceptual possibilities may exist, the natural person explanation of government contracting is conceptually coherent and best represents the law.</p>
spellingShingle Contracts--Government
Prerogative, Royal
Review of government action
Non-statutory power
Constitutional law
Heaton, D
The power of government to make contracts
title The power of government to make contracts
title_full The power of government to make contracts
title_fullStr The power of government to make contracts
title_full_unstemmed The power of government to make contracts
title_short The power of government to make contracts
title_sort power of government to make contracts
topic Contracts--Government
Prerogative, Royal
Review of government action
Non-statutory power
Constitutional law
work_keys_str_mv AT heatond thepowerofgovernmenttomakecontracts
AT heatond powerofgovernmenttomakecontracts