Evaluating PcGets and RETINA as Automatic Model Selection Algorithms.

The paper describes two automatic model selection algorithms, RETINA and PcGets, briefly discussing how the algorithms work and what their performance claims are. RETINA's Matlab implementation of the code is explained, then the program is compared with PcGets on the data in Perez-Amaral, Gallo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Castle, J
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Blackwell Publishing 2005
_version_ 1826274749809950720
author Castle, J
author_facet Castle, J
author_sort Castle, J
collection OXFORD
description The paper describes two automatic model selection algorithms, RETINA and PcGets, briefly discussing how the algorithms work and what their performance claims are. RETINA's Matlab implementation of the code is explained, then the program is compared with PcGets on the data in Perez-Amaral, Gallo and White (2005, Econometric Theory, Vol. 21, pp. 262-277), "A Comparison of Complementary Automatic Modelling Methods: RETINA and PcGets", and Hoover and Perez (1999, Econometrics Journal, Vol. 2, pp. 167-191), "Data Mining Reconsidered: Encompassing and the General-to-specific Approach to Specification Search". Monte Carlo simulation results assess the null and non-null rejection frequencies of the RETINA and PcGets model selection algorithms in the presence of nonlinear functions.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:48:11Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:5de8f204-699e-4dcd-8a8e-57c873d5320b
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:48:11Z
publishDate 2005
publisher Blackwell Publishing
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:5de8f204-699e-4dcd-8a8e-57c873d5320b2022-03-26T17:37:14ZEvaluating PcGets and RETINA as Automatic Model Selection Algorithms.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:5de8f204-699e-4dcd-8a8e-57c873d5320bEnglishDepartment of Economics - ePrintsBlackwell Publishing2005Castle, JThe paper describes two automatic model selection algorithms, RETINA and PcGets, briefly discussing how the algorithms work and what their performance claims are. RETINA's Matlab implementation of the code is explained, then the program is compared with PcGets on the data in Perez-Amaral, Gallo and White (2005, Econometric Theory, Vol. 21, pp. 262-277), "A Comparison of Complementary Automatic Modelling Methods: RETINA and PcGets", and Hoover and Perez (1999, Econometrics Journal, Vol. 2, pp. 167-191), "Data Mining Reconsidered: Encompassing and the General-to-specific Approach to Specification Search". Monte Carlo simulation results assess the null and non-null rejection frequencies of the RETINA and PcGets model selection algorithms in the presence of nonlinear functions.
spellingShingle Castle, J
Evaluating PcGets and RETINA as Automatic Model Selection Algorithms.
title Evaluating PcGets and RETINA as Automatic Model Selection Algorithms.
title_full Evaluating PcGets and RETINA as Automatic Model Selection Algorithms.
title_fullStr Evaluating PcGets and RETINA as Automatic Model Selection Algorithms.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating PcGets and RETINA as Automatic Model Selection Algorithms.
title_short Evaluating PcGets and RETINA as Automatic Model Selection Algorithms.
title_sort evaluating pcgets and retina as automatic model selection algorithms
work_keys_str_mv AT castlej evaluatingpcgetsandretinaasautomaticmodelselectionalgorithms