Evaluating forecasts, narratives and policy using a test of invariance

Economic policy agencies produce forecasts with accompanying narratives, and base policy changes on the resulting anticipated developments in the target variables. Systematic forecast failure, defined as large, persistent deviations of the outturns from the numerical forecasts, can make the associat...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
主要な著者: Castle, J, Hendry, D, Martinez, A
フォーマット: Journal article
出版事項: MDPI 2017
_version_ 1826274758884327424
author Castle, J
Hendry, D
Martinez, A
author_facet Castle, J
Hendry, D
Martinez, A
author_sort Castle, J
collection OXFORD
description Economic policy agencies produce forecasts with accompanying narratives, and base policy changes on the resulting anticipated developments in the target variables. Systematic forecast failure, defined as large, persistent deviations of the outturns from the numerical forecasts, can make the associated narrative false, which would in turn question the validity of the entailed policy implementation. We establish when systematic forecast failure entails failure of the accompanying narrative, which we call forediction failure, and when that in turn implies policy invalidity. Most policy regime changes involve location shifts, which can induce forediction failure unless the policy variable is super exogenous in the policy model. We propose a step-indicator saturation test to check in advance for invariance to policy changes. Systematic forecast failure, or a lack of invariance, previously justified by narratives reveals such stories to be economic fiction.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:48:19Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:5df2ded2-0c0f-4d69-97df-f04a9b7684a0
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:48:19Z
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:5df2ded2-0c0f-4d69-97df-f04a9b7684a02022-03-26T17:37:27ZEvaluating forecasts, narratives and policy using a test of invarianceJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:5df2ded2-0c0f-4d69-97df-f04a9b7684a0Symplectic Elements at OxfordMDPI2017Castle, JHendry, DMartinez, AEconomic policy agencies produce forecasts with accompanying narratives, and base policy changes on the resulting anticipated developments in the target variables. Systematic forecast failure, defined as large, persistent deviations of the outturns from the numerical forecasts, can make the associated narrative false, which would in turn question the validity of the entailed policy implementation. We establish when systematic forecast failure entails failure of the accompanying narrative, which we call forediction failure, and when that in turn implies policy invalidity. Most policy regime changes involve location shifts, which can induce forediction failure unless the policy variable is super exogenous in the policy model. We propose a step-indicator saturation test to check in advance for invariance to policy changes. Systematic forecast failure, or a lack of invariance, previously justified by narratives reveals such stories to be economic fiction.
spellingShingle Castle, J
Hendry, D
Martinez, A
Evaluating forecasts, narratives and policy using a test of invariance
title Evaluating forecasts, narratives and policy using a test of invariance
title_full Evaluating forecasts, narratives and policy using a test of invariance
title_fullStr Evaluating forecasts, narratives and policy using a test of invariance
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating forecasts, narratives and policy using a test of invariance
title_short Evaluating forecasts, narratives and policy using a test of invariance
title_sort evaluating forecasts narratives and policy using a test of invariance
work_keys_str_mv AT castlej evaluatingforecastsnarrativesandpolicyusingatestofinvariance
AT hendryd evaluatingforecastsnarrativesandpolicyusingatestofinvariance
AT martineza evaluatingforecastsnarrativesandpolicyusingatestofinvariance