How much substantive protection should investment treaties provide to foreign investment?
<p>This thesis contributes to academic debate about the question: how much substantive protection should investment treaties (IITs) provide to foreign investment? Chapters 5 and 6 argue that arbitral tribunals have interpreted fair and equitable treatment and indirect expropriation provisions...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2012
|
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1826274870271410176 |
|---|---|
| author | Bonnitcha, J |
| author2 | McCrudden, C |
| author_facet | McCrudden, C Bonnitcha, J |
| author_sort | Bonnitcha, J |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <p>This thesis contributes to academic debate about the question: how much substantive protection should investment treaties (IITs) provide to foreign investment? Chapters 5 and 6 argue that arbitral tribunals have interpreted fair and equitable treatment and indirect expropriation provisions of existing IITs in several different ways. Each of these interpretations is sketched as a model level of protection that could be explicitly adopted by states in the future, either through inclusion in new IITs, or through amendment to existing IITs. In this way, the thesis defines a range of prospective options available to states concerning the level of protection to provide to foreign investment through IITs. The thesis evaluates the relative desirability of these different levels of protection.</p><p>The thesis argues that different levels of protection should be evaluated according to their likely consequences. The thesis develops a framework for inferring and understanding the likely consequences of adopting different levels of protection. The framework proposes that the consequences of a given level of protection can be understood in terms of its likely effect on: economic efficiency; the distribution of economic costs and benefits; flows of foreign direct investment into host states; the realisation of human rights and environmental conservation in host states; and respect for the rule of law in host states. Within this framework, the thesis provides an assessment and synthesis of existing empirical evidence and explanatory theory so far as they relate to the consequences of IIT protections. It also specifies the normative criteria by which these consequences should be evaluated. Through the application of this framework, the thesis concludes that lower levels of protection of foreign investment are, in general, likely to be more desirable than higher levels of protection.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:50:03Z |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oxford-uuid:5e74c893-2224-403f-b3d3-06f23ed5c28f |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:50:03Z |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:5e74c893-2224-403f-b3d3-06f23ed5c28f2022-03-26T17:40:58ZHow much substantive protection should investment treaties provide to foreign investment?Thesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06uuid:5e74c893-2224-403f-b3d3-06f23ed5c28fPublic international lawEnglishOxford University Research Archive - Valet2012Bonnitcha, JMcCrudden, C<p>This thesis contributes to academic debate about the question: how much substantive protection should investment treaties (IITs) provide to foreign investment? Chapters 5 and 6 argue that arbitral tribunals have interpreted fair and equitable treatment and indirect expropriation provisions of existing IITs in several different ways. Each of these interpretations is sketched as a model level of protection that could be explicitly adopted by states in the future, either through inclusion in new IITs, or through amendment to existing IITs. In this way, the thesis defines a range of prospective options available to states concerning the level of protection to provide to foreign investment through IITs. The thesis evaluates the relative desirability of these different levels of protection.</p><p>The thesis argues that different levels of protection should be evaluated according to their likely consequences. The thesis develops a framework for inferring and understanding the likely consequences of adopting different levels of protection. The framework proposes that the consequences of a given level of protection can be understood in terms of its likely effect on: economic efficiency; the distribution of economic costs and benefits; flows of foreign direct investment into host states; the realisation of human rights and environmental conservation in host states; and respect for the rule of law in host states. Within this framework, the thesis provides an assessment and synthesis of existing empirical evidence and explanatory theory so far as they relate to the consequences of IIT protections. It also specifies the normative criteria by which these consequences should be evaluated. Through the application of this framework, the thesis concludes that lower levels of protection of foreign investment are, in general, likely to be more desirable than higher levels of protection.</p> |
| spellingShingle | Public international law Bonnitcha, J How much substantive protection should investment treaties provide to foreign investment? |
| title | How much substantive protection should investment treaties provide to foreign investment? |
| title_full | How much substantive protection should investment treaties provide to foreign investment? |
| title_fullStr | How much substantive protection should investment treaties provide to foreign investment? |
| title_full_unstemmed | How much substantive protection should investment treaties provide to foreign investment? |
| title_short | How much substantive protection should investment treaties provide to foreign investment? |
| title_sort | how much substantive protection should investment treaties provide to foreign investment |
| topic | Public international law |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bonnitchaj howmuchsubstantiveprotectionshouldinvestmenttreatiesprovidetoforeigninvestment |