Implementing precision psychiatry: a systematic review of individualized prediction models for clinical practice
<p><strong>Background</strong></p> <p>The impact of precision psychiatry for clinical practice has not been systematically appraised. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of validated prediction models to estimate the individual risk of being affected with...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
| _version_ | 1826274918830964736 |
|---|---|
| author | Salazar de Pablo, G Studerus, E Vaquerizo-Serrano, J Irving, J Catalan, A Oliver, D Baldwin, H Danese, A Fazel, S Steyerberg, EW Stahl, D Fusar-Poli, P |
| author_facet | Salazar de Pablo, G Studerus, E Vaquerizo-Serrano, J Irving, J Catalan, A Oliver, D Baldwin, H Danese, A Fazel, S Steyerberg, EW Stahl, D Fusar-Poli, P |
| author_sort | Salazar de Pablo, G |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <p><strong>Background</strong></p>
<p>The impact of precision psychiatry for clinical practice has not been systematically appraised. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of validated prediction models to estimate the individual risk of being affected with a condition (diagnostic), developing outcomes (prognostic), or responding to treatments (predictive) in mental disorders.</p>
<p><strong>Methods</strong></p>
<p>PRISMA/RIGHT/CHARMS-compliant systematic review of the Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Reviews, and Ovid/PsycINFO databases from inception until July 21, 2019 (PROSPERO CRD42019155713) to identify diagnostic/prognostic/predictive prediction studies that reported individualized estimates in psychiatry and that were internally or externally validated or implemented. Random effect meta-regression analyses addressed the impact of several factors on the accuracy of prediction models.</p>
<p><strong>Findings</strong></p>
<p>Literature search identified 584 prediction modeling studies, of which 89 were included. 10.4% of the total studies included prediction models internally validated (n = 61), 4.6% models externally validated (n = 27), and 0.2% (n = 1) models considered for implementation. Across validated prediction modeling studies (n = 88), 18.2% were diagnostic, 68.2% prognostic, and 13.6% predictive. The most frequently investigated condition was psychosis (36.4%), and the most frequently employed predictors clinical (69.5%). Unimodal compared to multimodal models (β = .29, P = .03) and diagnostic compared to prognostic (β = .84, p < .0001) and predictive (β = .87, P = .002) models were associated with increased accuracy.</p>
<p><strong>Interpretation</strong></p>
<p>To date, several validated prediction models are available to support the diagnosis and prognosis of psychiatric conditions, in particular, psychosis, or to predict treatment response. Advancements of knowledge are limited by the lack of implementation research in real-world clinical practice. A new generation of implementation research is required to address this translational gap.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:50:48Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:5eb5ee85-2117-4a6a-b421-32bfc3e1960b |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:50:48Z |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publisher | Oxford University Press |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:5eb5ee85-2117-4a6a-b421-32bfc3e1960b2022-03-26T17:42:24ZImplementing precision psychiatry: a systematic review of individualized prediction models for clinical practiceJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:5eb5ee85-2117-4a6a-b421-32bfc3e1960bEnglishSymplectic ElementsOxford University Press2020Salazar de Pablo, GStuderus, EVaquerizo-Serrano, JIrving, JCatalan, AOliver, DBaldwin, HDanese, AFazel, SSteyerberg, EWStahl, DFusar-Poli, P<p><strong>Background</strong></p> <p>The impact of precision psychiatry for clinical practice has not been systematically appraised. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of validated prediction models to estimate the individual risk of being affected with a condition (diagnostic), developing outcomes (prognostic), or responding to treatments (predictive) in mental disorders.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong></p> <p>PRISMA/RIGHT/CHARMS-compliant systematic review of the Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Reviews, and Ovid/PsycINFO databases from inception until July 21, 2019 (PROSPERO CRD42019155713) to identify diagnostic/prognostic/predictive prediction studies that reported individualized estimates in psychiatry and that were internally or externally validated or implemented. Random effect meta-regression analyses addressed the impact of several factors on the accuracy of prediction models.</p> <p><strong>Findings</strong></p> <p>Literature search identified 584 prediction modeling studies, of which 89 were included. 10.4% of the total studies included prediction models internally validated (n = 61), 4.6% models externally validated (n = 27), and 0.2% (n = 1) models considered for implementation. Across validated prediction modeling studies (n = 88), 18.2% were diagnostic, 68.2% prognostic, and 13.6% predictive. The most frequently investigated condition was psychosis (36.4%), and the most frequently employed predictors clinical (69.5%). Unimodal compared to multimodal models (β = .29, P = .03) and diagnostic compared to prognostic (β = .84, p < .0001) and predictive (β = .87, P = .002) models were associated with increased accuracy.</p> <p><strong>Interpretation</strong></p> <p>To date, several validated prediction models are available to support the diagnosis and prognosis of psychiatric conditions, in particular, psychosis, or to predict treatment response. Advancements of knowledge are limited by the lack of implementation research in real-world clinical practice. A new generation of implementation research is required to address this translational gap.</p> |
| spellingShingle | Salazar de Pablo, G Studerus, E Vaquerizo-Serrano, J Irving, J Catalan, A Oliver, D Baldwin, H Danese, A Fazel, S Steyerberg, EW Stahl, D Fusar-Poli, P Implementing precision psychiatry: a systematic review of individualized prediction models for clinical practice |
| title | Implementing precision psychiatry: a systematic review of individualized prediction models for clinical practice |
| title_full | Implementing precision psychiatry: a systematic review of individualized prediction models for clinical practice |
| title_fullStr | Implementing precision psychiatry: a systematic review of individualized prediction models for clinical practice |
| title_full_unstemmed | Implementing precision psychiatry: a systematic review of individualized prediction models for clinical practice |
| title_short | Implementing precision psychiatry: a systematic review of individualized prediction models for clinical practice |
| title_sort | implementing precision psychiatry a systematic review of individualized prediction models for clinical practice |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT salazardepablog implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT studeruse implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT vaquerizoserranoj implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT irvingj implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT catalana implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT oliverd implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT baldwinh implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT danesea implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT fazels implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT steyerbergew implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT stahld implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT fusarpolip implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice |