Apparent marked reduction in early antivenom reactions compared to historical controls: was it prophylaxis or method of administration?
OBJECTIVE: Serious morbidity and mortality following snakebite injuries are common in tropical regions of the world. Although antivenom administration is clinically effective, it carries an important risk of early anaphylactic reactions, ranging from relatively benign nausea, vomiting, and urticari...
Main Authors: | Caron, E, Manock, SR, Maudlin, J, Koleski, J, Theakston, R, Warrell, D, Smalligan, R |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2009
|
Similar Items
-
Crotaline snake bite in the Ecuadorian Amazon: randomised double blind comparative trial of three South American polyspecific antivenoms
by: Smalligan, R, et al.
Published: (2004) -
Crotaline snake bite in the Ecuadorian Amazon: randomised double blind comparative trial of three South American polyspecific antivenoms.
by: Smalligan, R, et al.
Published: (2004) -
Sequential randomised and double blind trial of promethazine prophylaxis against early anaphylactic reactions to antivenom for bothrops snake bites.
by: Fan, H, et al.
Published: (1999) -
Sequential randomised and double blind trial of promethazine prophylaxis against early anaphylactic reactions to antivenom for bothrops snake bites
by: Fan, H, et al.
Published: (1999) -
Crisis in snake antivenom supply for Africa
by: Theakston, R, et al.
Published: (2000)