What we owe to future people: a contractualist account of intergenerational ethics

<p>This thesis applies T.M. Scanlon's version of contractualism to the problem of future generations. I begin by analyzing Rawls' contractarian account of just savings and find that there is no plausible composition of the original position that can deal with the inclusion of future...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Finneron-Burns, E
Other Authors: Butt, D
Format: Thesis
Published: 2015
_version_ 1797110295345233920
author Finneron-Burns, E
author2 Butt, D
author_facet Butt, D
Finneron-Burns, E
author_sort Finneron-Burns, E
collection OXFORD
description <p>This thesis applies T.M. Scanlon's version of contractualism to the problem of future generations. I begin by analyzing Rawls' contractarian account of just savings and find that there is no plausible composition of the original position that can deal with the inclusion of future people. I then examine Scanlon's contractualism and some objections to it before moving on to applying it to future people. I argue that the disanalogies between the intra- and inter-generational contexts do not preclude including future people in the contractualist framework, and that the theory avoids the non-identity problem. Part II of the thesis applies contractualism to three intergenerational topics and develops principles governing them: resource conservation, procreation, and population size. To conclude, I address how to deal with the fact that, in the case of future generations, we often have imperfect knowledge of what they will need, how our actions will affect them, and how many of them there will be. </p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:52:58Z
format Thesis
id oxford-uuid:5f49ca7a-2498-4786-8cfa-c3ce2be2d960
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:52:58Z
publishDate 2015
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:5f49ca7a-2498-4786-8cfa-c3ce2be2d9602023-07-25T11:59:34ZWhat we owe to future people: a contractualist account of intergenerational ethicsThesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06uuid:5f49ca7a-2498-4786-8cfa-c3ce2be2d960ORA Deposit2015Finneron-Burns, EButt, DCaney, SO'Neill, M<p>This thesis applies T.M. Scanlon's version of contractualism to the problem of future generations. I begin by analyzing Rawls' contractarian account of just savings and find that there is no plausible composition of the original position that can deal with the inclusion of future people. I then examine Scanlon's contractualism and some objections to it before moving on to applying it to future people. I argue that the disanalogies between the intra- and inter-generational contexts do not preclude including future people in the contractualist framework, and that the theory avoids the non-identity problem. Part II of the thesis applies contractualism to three intergenerational topics and develops principles governing them: resource conservation, procreation, and population size. To conclude, I address how to deal with the fact that, in the case of future generations, we often have imperfect knowledge of what they will need, how our actions will affect them, and how many of them there will be. </p>
spellingShingle Finneron-Burns, E
What we owe to future people: a contractualist account of intergenerational ethics
title What we owe to future people: a contractualist account of intergenerational ethics
title_full What we owe to future people: a contractualist account of intergenerational ethics
title_fullStr What we owe to future people: a contractualist account of intergenerational ethics
title_full_unstemmed What we owe to future people: a contractualist account of intergenerational ethics
title_short What we owe to future people: a contractualist account of intergenerational ethics
title_sort what we owe to future people a contractualist account of intergenerational ethics
work_keys_str_mv AT finneronburnse whatweowetofuturepeopleacontractualistaccountofintergenerationalethics