Antibodies against Chlamydia trachomatis and ovarian cancer risk in two independent populations

<br/><strong>Background: </strong>Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) has been associated with ovarian cancer risk. To clarify the role of Chlamydia trachomatis and other infectious agents in the development of ovarian cancer, we evaluated the association of serologic markers with in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Trabert, B, Waterboer, T, Idahl, A, Brenner, N, Brinton, L, Butt, J, Coburn, S, Hartge, P, Hufnagel, K, Inturrisi, F, Lissowska, J, Mentzer, A, Peplonska, B, Sherman, M, Wills, G, Woodhall, S, Pawlita, M, Wentzensen, N
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2018
_version_ 1826275081540599808
author Trabert, B
Waterboer, T
Idahl, A
Brenner, N
Brinton, L
Butt, J
Coburn, S
Hartge, P
Hufnagel, K
Inturrisi, F
Lissowska, J
Mentzer, A
Peplonska, B
Sherman, M
Wills, G
Woodhall, S
Pawlita, M
Wentzensen, N
author_facet Trabert, B
Waterboer, T
Idahl, A
Brenner, N
Brinton, L
Butt, J
Coburn, S
Hartge, P
Hufnagel, K
Inturrisi, F
Lissowska, J
Mentzer, A
Peplonska, B
Sherman, M
Wills, G
Woodhall, S
Pawlita, M
Wentzensen, N
author_sort Trabert, B
collection OXFORD
description <br/><strong>Background: </strong>Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) has been associated with ovarian cancer risk. To clarify the role of Chlamydia trachomatis and other infectious agents in the development of ovarian cancer, we evaluated the association of serologic markers with incident ovarian cancer using a staged approach in two independent populations.<br/><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies included: 1) a case–control study in Poland (244 ovarian cancers/556 control subjects) and 2) a prospective nested case–control study in the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial (160 ovarian cancers/159 control subjects). Associations of serologic marker levels with ovarian cancer risk at diagnostic as well as higher thresholds, identified in Poland and independently evaluated in PLCO, were estimated using multivariable adjusted logistic regression.<br/><strong>Results: </strong>In the Polish study, antibodies (based on laboratory cut-point) against the chlamydia plasmid-encoded Pgp3 protein (serological gold standard) were associated with increased ovarian cancer risk (adjusted odds ratio [OR] ¼ 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] ¼ 1.20 to 2.22); when a positive result was redefined at higher levels, ovarian cancer risk was increased (cut-point 2: OR ¼ 2.00, 95% CI ¼ 1.38 to 2.89; cut-point 3 [max OR]: OR ¼ 2.19, 95% CI ¼ 1.29 to 3.73). In the prospective PLCO study, Pgp3 antibodies were associated with elevated risk at the laboratory cut-point (OR ¼ 1.43, 95% CI ¼ 0.78 to 2.63) and more stringent cut-points (cut-point 2: OR ¼ 2.25, 95% CI ¼ 1.07 to 4.71); cut-point 3: OR ¼ 2.53, 95% CI ¼ 0.63 to 10.08). In both studies, antibodies against other infectious agents measured were not associated with risk.<br/><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In two independent populations, antibodies against prior/current C. trachomatis (Pgp3) were associated with a doubling in ovarian cancer risk, whereas markers of other infectious agents were unrelated. These findings lend support for an association between PID and ovarian cancer.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:53:16Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:5f8369a6-6600-46ce-8bfa-d1ab6f853071
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:53:16Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:5f8369a6-6600-46ce-8bfa-d1ab6f8530712022-03-26T17:47:25ZAntibodies against Chlamydia trachomatis and ovarian cancer risk in two independent populationsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:5f8369a6-6600-46ce-8bfa-d1ab6f853071EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordOxford University Press2018Trabert, BWaterboer, TIdahl, ABrenner, NBrinton, LButt, JCoburn, SHartge, PHufnagel, KInturrisi, FLissowska, JMentzer, APeplonska, BSherman, MWills, GWoodhall, SPawlita, MWentzensen, N<br/><strong>Background: </strong>Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) has been associated with ovarian cancer risk. To clarify the role of Chlamydia trachomatis and other infectious agents in the development of ovarian cancer, we evaluated the association of serologic markers with incident ovarian cancer using a staged approach in two independent populations.<br/><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies included: 1) a case–control study in Poland (244 ovarian cancers/556 control subjects) and 2) a prospective nested case–control study in the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial (160 ovarian cancers/159 control subjects). Associations of serologic marker levels with ovarian cancer risk at diagnostic as well as higher thresholds, identified in Poland and independently evaluated in PLCO, were estimated using multivariable adjusted logistic regression.<br/><strong>Results: </strong>In the Polish study, antibodies (based on laboratory cut-point) against the chlamydia plasmid-encoded Pgp3 protein (serological gold standard) were associated with increased ovarian cancer risk (adjusted odds ratio [OR] ¼ 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] ¼ 1.20 to 2.22); when a positive result was redefined at higher levels, ovarian cancer risk was increased (cut-point 2: OR ¼ 2.00, 95% CI ¼ 1.38 to 2.89; cut-point 3 [max OR]: OR ¼ 2.19, 95% CI ¼ 1.29 to 3.73). In the prospective PLCO study, Pgp3 antibodies were associated with elevated risk at the laboratory cut-point (OR ¼ 1.43, 95% CI ¼ 0.78 to 2.63) and more stringent cut-points (cut-point 2: OR ¼ 2.25, 95% CI ¼ 1.07 to 4.71); cut-point 3: OR ¼ 2.53, 95% CI ¼ 0.63 to 10.08). In both studies, antibodies against other infectious agents measured were not associated with risk.<br/><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In two independent populations, antibodies against prior/current C. trachomatis (Pgp3) were associated with a doubling in ovarian cancer risk, whereas markers of other infectious agents were unrelated. These findings lend support for an association between PID and ovarian cancer.
spellingShingle Trabert, B
Waterboer, T
Idahl, A
Brenner, N
Brinton, L
Butt, J
Coburn, S
Hartge, P
Hufnagel, K
Inturrisi, F
Lissowska, J
Mentzer, A
Peplonska, B
Sherman, M
Wills, G
Woodhall, S
Pawlita, M
Wentzensen, N
Antibodies against Chlamydia trachomatis and ovarian cancer risk in two independent populations
title Antibodies against Chlamydia trachomatis and ovarian cancer risk in two independent populations
title_full Antibodies against Chlamydia trachomatis and ovarian cancer risk in two independent populations
title_fullStr Antibodies against Chlamydia trachomatis and ovarian cancer risk in two independent populations
title_full_unstemmed Antibodies against Chlamydia trachomatis and ovarian cancer risk in two independent populations
title_short Antibodies against Chlamydia trachomatis and ovarian cancer risk in two independent populations
title_sort antibodies against chlamydia trachomatis and ovarian cancer risk in two independent populations
work_keys_str_mv AT trabertb antibodiesagainstchlamydiatrachomatisandovariancancerriskintwoindependentpopulations
AT waterboert antibodiesagainstchlamydiatrachomatisandovariancancerriskintwoindependentpopulations
AT idahla antibodiesagainstchlamydiatrachomatisandovariancancerriskintwoindependentpopulations
AT brennern antibodiesagainstchlamydiatrachomatisandovariancancerriskintwoindependentpopulations
AT brintonl antibodiesagainstchlamydiatrachomatisandovariancancerriskintwoindependentpopulations
AT buttj antibodiesagainstchlamydiatrachomatisandovariancancerriskintwoindependentpopulations
AT coburns antibodiesagainstchlamydiatrachomatisandovariancancerriskintwoindependentpopulations
AT hartgep antibodiesagainstchlamydiatrachomatisandovariancancerriskintwoindependentpopulations
AT hufnagelk antibodiesagainstchlamydiatrachomatisandovariancancerriskintwoindependentpopulations
AT inturrisif antibodiesagainstchlamydiatrachomatisandovariancancerriskintwoindependentpopulations
AT lissowskaj antibodiesagainstchlamydiatrachomatisandovariancancerriskintwoindependentpopulations
AT mentzera antibodiesagainstchlamydiatrachomatisandovariancancerriskintwoindependentpopulations
AT peplonskab antibodiesagainstchlamydiatrachomatisandovariancancerriskintwoindependentpopulations
AT shermanm antibodiesagainstchlamydiatrachomatisandovariancancerriskintwoindependentpopulations
AT willsg antibodiesagainstchlamydiatrachomatisandovariancancerriskintwoindependentpopulations
AT woodhalls antibodiesagainstchlamydiatrachomatisandovariancancerriskintwoindependentpopulations
AT pawlitam antibodiesagainstchlamydiatrachomatisandovariancancerriskintwoindependentpopulations
AT wentzensenn antibodiesagainstchlamydiatrachomatisandovariancancerriskintwoindependentpopulations