An overview of systematic reviews found suboptimal reporting and methodological limitations of mediation studies investigating causal mechanisms

<p><strong>Objectives:</strong><br /> The objective of this study was to investigate whether systematic reviews of mediation studies identify limitations in reporting quality and methodological conduct.</p><br /> <p><strong>Study Design and Setting:&l...

Повний опис

Бібліографічні деталі
Автори: Cashin, A, Lee, H, Lamb, S, Hopewell, S, Mansell, G, Williams, C, Kamper, S, Henschke, N, McAuley, J
Формат: Journal article
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Elsevier 2019
_version_ 1826275093122121728
author Cashin, A
Lee, H
Lamb, S
Hopewell, S
Mansell, G
Williams, C
Kamper, S
Henschke, N
McAuley, J
author_facet Cashin, A
Lee, H
Lamb, S
Hopewell, S
Mansell, G
Williams, C
Kamper, S
Henschke, N
McAuley, J
author_sort Cashin, A
collection OXFORD
description <p><strong>Objectives:</strong><br /> The objective of this study was to investigate whether systematic reviews of mediation studies identify limitations in reporting quality and methodological conduct.</p><br /> <p><strong>Study Design and Setting:</strong><br /> We conducted an overview of systematic reviews. We searched four databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and PubMed) to identify systematic reviews of studies that used mediation analysis to investigate mechanisms of health care interventions or exposures in clinical populations between 2007 and 2017. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts. Summary data on the characteristics, reporting quality, and methodological conduct of the studies included in the systematic reviews were extracted independently by two reviewers. The protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42017059834).</p><br /> <p><strong>Results:</strong><br /> Fifty-four systematic reviews were included, representing 11 health care fields, 26 health conditions, and 2008 mediation studies. Eighteen of fifty-four systematic reviews (33%) explicitly stated that the reporting of primary studies was suboptimal. Of these, 14/18 (78%) reviews noted incomplete reporting of effect sizes and precision estimates from mediation analyses. Twenty-nine of fifty-four systematic reviews (54%) identified limitations in the methodological conduct of primary studies.</p><br /> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong><br /> The reporting and methodological conduct of studies investigating mechanisms in health care seems to be suboptimal. Guidance is needed to improve the quality, completeness, and transparency of mediation studies.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:53:27Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:5f93c5c4-db04-4e7d-aaa5-76663e02e236
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:53:27Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:5f93c5c4-db04-4e7d-aaa5-76663e02e2362022-03-26T17:47:51ZAn overview of systematic reviews found suboptimal reporting and methodological limitations of mediation studies investigating causal mechanismsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:5f93c5c4-db04-4e7d-aaa5-76663e02e236EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2019Cashin, ALee, HLamb, SHopewell, SMansell, GWilliams, CKamper, SHenschke, NMcAuley, J<p><strong>Objectives:</strong><br /> The objective of this study was to investigate whether systematic reviews of mediation studies identify limitations in reporting quality and methodological conduct.</p><br /> <p><strong>Study Design and Setting:</strong><br /> We conducted an overview of systematic reviews. We searched four databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and PubMed) to identify systematic reviews of studies that used mediation analysis to investigate mechanisms of health care interventions or exposures in clinical populations between 2007 and 2017. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts. Summary data on the characteristics, reporting quality, and methodological conduct of the studies included in the systematic reviews were extracted independently by two reviewers. The protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42017059834).</p><br /> <p><strong>Results:</strong><br /> Fifty-four systematic reviews were included, representing 11 health care fields, 26 health conditions, and 2008 mediation studies. Eighteen of fifty-four systematic reviews (33%) explicitly stated that the reporting of primary studies was suboptimal. Of these, 14/18 (78%) reviews noted incomplete reporting of effect sizes and precision estimates from mediation analyses. Twenty-nine of fifty-four systematic reviews (54%) identified limitations in the methodological conduct of primary studies.</p><br /> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong><br /> The reporting and methodological conduct of studies investigating mechanisms in health care seems to be suboptimal. Guidance is needed to improve the quality, completeness, and transparency of mediation studies.</p>
spellingShingle Cashin, A
Lee, H
Lamb, S
Hopewell, S
Mansell, G
Williams, C
Kamper, S
Henschke, N
McAuley, J
An overview of systematic reviews found suboptimal reporting and methodological limitations of mediation studies investigating causal mechanisms
title An overview of systematic reviews found suboptimal reporting and methodological limitations of mediation studies investigating causal mechanisms
title_full An overview of systematic reviews found suboptimal reporting and methodological limitations of mediation studies investigating causal mechanisms
title_fullStr An overview of systematic reviews found suboptimal reporting and methodological limitations of mediation studies investigating causal mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed An overview of systematic reviews found suboptimal reporting and methodological limitations of mediation studies investigating causal mechanisms
title_short An overview of systematic reviews found suboptimal reporting and methodological limitations of mediation studies investigating causal mechanisms
title_sort overview of systematic reviews found suboptimal reporting and methodological limitations of mediation studies investigating causal mechanisms
work_keys_str_mv AT cashina anoverviewofsystematicreviewsfoundsuboptimalreportingandmethodologicallimitationsofmediationstudiesinvestigatingcausalmechanisms
AT leeh anoverviewofsystematicreviewsfoundsuboptimalreportingandmethodologicallimitationsofmediationstudiesinvestigatingcausalmechanisms
AT lambs anoverviewofsystematicreviewsfoundsuboptimalreportingandmethodologicallimitationsofmediationstudiesinvestigatingcausalmechanisms
AT hopewells anoverviewofsystematicreviewsfoundsuboptimalreportingandmethodologicallimitationsofmediationstudiesinvestigatingcausalmechanisms
AT mansellg anoverviewofsystematicreviewsfoundsuboptimalreportingandmethodologicallimitationsofmediationstudiesinvestigatingcausalmechanisms
AT williamsc anoverviewofsystematicreviewsfoundsuboptimalreportingandmethodologicallimitationsofmediationstudiesinvestigatingcausalmechanisms
AT kampers anoverviewofsystematicreviewsfoundsuboptimalreportingandmethodologicallimitationsofmediationstudiesinvestigatingcausalmechanisms
AT henschken anoverviewofsystematicreviewsfoundsuboptimalreportingandmethodologicallimitationsofmediationstudiesinvestigatingcausalmechanisms
AT mcauleyj anoverviewofsystematicreviewsfoundsuboptimalreportingandmethodologicallimitationsofmediationstudiesinvestigatingcausalmechanisms
AT cashina overviewofsystematicreviewsfoundsuboptimalreportingandmethodologicallimitationsofmediationstudiesinvestigatingcausalmechanisms
AT leeh overviewofsystematicreviewsfoundsuboptimalreportingandmethodologicallimitationsofmediationstudiesinvestigatingcausalmechanisms
AT lambs overviewofsystematicreviewsfoundsuboptimalreportingandmethodologicallimitationsofmediationstudiesinvestigatingcausalmechanisms
AT hopewells overviewofsystematicreviewsfoundsuboptimalreportingandmethodologicallimitationsofmediationstudiesinvestigatingcausalmechanisms
AT mansellg overviewofsystematicreviewsfoundsuboptimalreportingandmethodologicallimitationsofmediationstudiesinvestigatingcausalmechanisms
AT williamsc overviewofsystematicreviewsfoundsuboptimalreportingandmethodologicallimitationsofmediationstudiesinvestigatingcausalmechanisms
AT kampers overviewofsystematicreviewsfoundsuboptimalreportingandmethodologicallimitationsofmediationstudiesinvestigatingcausalmechanisms
AT henschken overviewofsystematicreviewsfoundsuboptimalreportingandmethodologicallimitationsofmediationstudiesinvestigatingcausalmechanisms
AT mcauleyj overviewofsystematicreviewsfoundsuboptimalreportingandmethodologicallimitationsofmediationstudiesinvestigatingcausalmechanisms