Reflections on the UK's approach to the 2009 swine flu pandemic: conflicts between national government and the local management of the public health response.

The first cases of swine flu in the UK were detected on 27th April 2009. Two weeks later Birmingham became a "hotspot" for the HIN1 pandemic in England. This paper describes the experiences of local public health agencies during the pandemic and the problems encountered when trying to work...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chambers, J, Barker, K, Rouse, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2012
_version_ 1797071683768549376
author Chambers, J
Barker, K
Rouse, A
author_facet Chambers, J
Barker, K
Rouse, A
author_sort Chambers, J
collection OXFORD
description The first cases of swine flu in the UK were detected on 27th April 2009. Two weeks later Birmingham became a "hotspot" for the HIN1 pandemic in England. This paper describes the experiences of local public health agencies during the pandemic and the problems encountered when trying to work within a hierarchical and hermetic system of national policy making. We argue that over reliance on the speculative logic of modellers, together with a failure to adapt swiftly the nation's preparedness plans and public health apparatus created in readiness for a serious and fatal disease, led to an institutional void of policy making during the pandemic, where new rules and concepts emerged about what constituted scientifically acceptable and politically legitimate interventions. The imposition of a single national approach to managing the pandemic and a disregard for the role of local authorities seriously impaired the ability of local agencies to respond in a flexible, timely and pragmatic way to the rapidly emerging situation. Future planning for pandemics must recognise that global epidemics are curbed at the local level, and ensure that any response is proportionate, flexible and effective.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:56:51Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:60b18a9a-2666-4442-8ac0-fc0ef5cb1645
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:56:51Z
publishDate 2012
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:60b18a9a-2666-4442-8ac0-fc0ef5cb16452022-03-26T17:54:54ZReflections on the UK's approach to the 2009 swine flu pandemic: conflicts between national government and the local management of the public health response.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:60b18a9a-2666-4442-8ac0-fc0ef5cb1645EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2012Chambers, JBarker, KRouse, AThe first cases of swine flu in the UK were detected on 27th April 2009. Two weeks later Birmingham became a "hotspot" for the HIN1 pandemic in England. This paper describes the experiences of local public health agencies during the pandemic and the problems encountered when trying to work within a hierarchical and hermetic system of national policy making. We argue that over reliance on the speculative logic of modellers, together with a failure to adapt swiftly the nation's preparedness plans and public health apparatus created in readiness for a serious and fatal disease, led to an institutional void of policy making during the pandemic, where new rules and concepts emerged about what constituted scientifically acceptable and politically legitimate interventions. The imposition of a single national approach to managing the pandemic and a disregard for the role of local authorities seriously impaired the ability of local agencies to respond in a flexible, timely and pragmatic way to the rapidly emerging situation. Future planning for pandemics must recognise that global epidemics are curbed at the local level, and ensure that any response is proportionate, flexible and effective.
spellingShingle Chambers, J
Barker, K
Rouse, A
Reflections on the UK's approach to the 2009 swine flu pandemic: conflicts between national government and the local management of the public health response.
title Reflections on the UK's approach to the 2009 swine flu pandemic: conflicts between national government and the local management of the public health response.
title_full Reflections on the UK's approach to the 2009 swine flu pandemic: conflicts between national government and the local management of the public health response.
title_fullStr Reflections on the UK's approach to the 2009 swine flu pandemic: conflicts between national government and the local management of the public health response.
title_full_unstemmed Reflections on the UK's approach to the 2009 swine flu pandemic: conflicts between national government and the local management of the public health response.
title_short Reflections on the UK's approach to the 2009 swine flu pandemic: conflicts between national government and the local management of the public health response.
title_sort reflections on the uk s approach to the 2009 swine flu pandemic conflicts between national government and the local management of the public health response
work_keys_str_mv AT chambersj reflectionsontheuksapproachtothe2009swineflupandemicconflictsbetweennationalgovernmentandthelocalmanagementofthepublichealthresponse
AT barkerk reflectionsontheuksapproachtothe2009swineflupandemicconflictsbetweennationalgovernmentandthelocalmanagementofthepublichealthresponse
AT rousea reflectionsontheuksapproachtothe2009swineflupandemicconflictsbetweennationalgovernmentandthelocalmanagementofthepublichealthresponse