An ethical and prudential argument for prioritizing the reduction of parasite-stress in the allocation of health care resources.
The link between parasite-stress and complex psychological dispositions implies that the social, political, and economic benefits likely to flow from public health interventions that reduce rates of non-zoonotic infectious disease are far greater than have traditionally been thought. We sketch a pru...
Principais autores: | Powell, R, Clarke, S, Savulescu, J |
---|---|
Formato: | Journal article |
Idioma: | English |
Publicado em: |
Cambridge University Press
2012
|
Registros relacionados
-
Biomedical ethics reviews 1994: Allocating health care resources - Humber,JM, Almeder,RF
por: Savulescu, J
Publicado em: (1995) -
Against moral responsibilisation of health: prudential responsibility and health promotion
por: Brown, RCH, et al.
Publicado em: (2019) -
A PRUDENTIAL PERSONALIST ETHICAL APPRAISAL OF HUMAN CLONING
por: Peter O.O. Ottuh
Publicado em: (2021-09-01) -
Prudential Versus Probative Arguments for Religious Faith: Descartes and Pascal on Reason and Faith
por: Dennis Sansom
Publicado em: (2017-07-01) -
Micro-prudential vs Macro-prudential Regulation
por: Liviu Serbanescu
Publicado em: (2022-09-01)