Validity and reliability of measurement of capillary refill time in children: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Most guidelines recommend the use of capillary refill time (CRT) as part of the routine assessment of unwell children, but there is little consensus on the optimum method of measurement and cut-off time. METHODS: We searched Medline (from 1948), Embase (from 1980) and CINAHL (from 1991)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fleming, S, Gill, P, Jones, C, Taylor, J, Van den Bruel, A, Heneghan, C, Thompson, M
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
_version_ 1797071932932227072
author Fleming, S
Gill, P
Jones, C
Taylor, J
Van den Bruel, A
Heneghan, C
Thompson, M
author_facet Fleming, S
Gill, P
Jones, C
Taylor, J
Van den Bruel, A
Heneghan, C
Thompson, M
author_sort Fleming, S
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: Most guidelines recommend the use of capillary refill time (CRT) as part of the routine assessment of unwell children, but there is little consensus on the optimum method of measurement and cut-off time. METHODS: We searched Medline (from 1948), Embase (from 1980) and CINAHL (from 1991) to June 2014 to identify studies with information on the normal range of CRT in healthy children, the validity of CRT compared with reference standard measures of haemodynamic status, reliability and factors influencing measurement of CRT, such as body site, pressing time and temperature. FINDINGS: We included 21 studies on 1915 children. Four studies provided information on the relationship between CRT and measures of cardiovascular status, 13 provided data on the normal range of CRT, 7 provided data on reliability and 10 assessed the effect of various confounding factors. In children over 7 days of age, the upper limit of normal CRT is approximately 2 s when measured on a finger, and 4 s when measured on the chest or foot, irrespective of whether the child is feverish or not. Longer pressing times and ambient temperature outside 20°C-25°C are associated with longer CRT. Evidence suggests that the use of stopwatches reduces variability between observers. INTERPRETATION: We recommend use of the following standardised CRT method of measurement: press on the finger for 5 s using moderate pressure at an ambient temperature of 20°C-25°C. A capillary refill time of 3 s or more should be considered abnormal.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T23:00:25Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:61e88985-b211-4508-80b9-634721ee4c0e
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T23:00:25Z
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:61e88985-b211-4508-80b9-634721ee4c0e2022-03-26T18:02:57ZValidity and reliability of measurement of capillary refill time in children: a systematic reviewJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:61e88985-b211-4508-80b9-634721ee4c0eEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordBMJ Publishing Group2015Fleming, SGill, PJones, CTaylor, JVan den Bruel, AHeneghan, CThompson, MBACKGROUND: Most guidelines recommend the use of capillary refill time (CRT) as part of the routine assessment of unwell children, but there is little consensus on the optimum method of measurement and cut-off time. METHODS: We searched Medline (from 1948), Embase (from 1980) and CINAHL (from 1991) to June 2014 to identify studies with information on the normal range of CRT in healthy children, the validity of CRT compared with reference standard measures of haemodynamic status, reliability and factors influencing measurement of CRT, such as body site, pressing time and temperature. FINDINGS: We included 21 studies on 1915 children. Four studies provided information on the relationship between CRT and measures of cardiovascular status, 13 provided data on the normal range of CRT, 7 provided data on reliability and 10 assessed the effect of various confounding factors. In children over 7 days of age, the upper limit of normal CRT is approximately 2 s when measured on a finger, and 4 s when measured on the chest or foot, irrespective of whether the child is feverish or not. Longer pressing times and ambient temperature outside 20°C-25°C are associated with longer CRT. Evidence suggests that the use of stopwatches reduces variability between observers. INTERPRETATION: We recommend use of the following standardised CRT method of measurement: press on the finger for 5 s using moderate pressure at an ambient temperature of 20°C-25°C. A capillary refill time of 3 s or more should be considered abnormal.
spellingShingle Fleming, S
Gill, P
Jones, C
Taylor, J
Van den Bruel, A
Heneghan, C
Thompson, M
Validity and reliability of measurement of capillary refill time in children: a systematic review
title Validity and reliability of measurement of capillary refill time in children: a systematic review
title_full Validity and reliability of measurement of capillary refill time in children: a systematic review
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of measurement of capillary refill time in children: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of measurement of capillary refill time in children: a systematic review
title_short Validity and reliability of measurement of capillary refill time in children: a systematic review
title_sort validity and reliability of measurement of capillary refill time in children a systematic review
work_keys_str_mv AT flemings validityandreliabilityofmeasurementofcapillaryrefilltimeinchildrenasystematicreview
AT gillp validityandreliabilityofmeasurementofcapillaryrefilltimeinchildrenasystematicreview
AT jonesc validityandreliabilityofmeasurementofcapillaryrefilltimeinchildrenasystematicreview
AT taylorj validityandreliabilityofmeasurementofcapillaryrefilltimeinchildrenasystematicreview
AT vandenbruela validityandreliabilityofmeasurementofcapillaryrefilltimeinchildrenasystematicreview
AT heneghanc validityandreliabilityofmeasurementofcapillaryrefilltimeinchildrenasystematicreview
AT thompsonm validityandreliabilityofmeasurementofcapillaryrefilltimeinchildrenasystematicreview