Testing multi-alternative decision models with non-stationary evidence

Recent research has investigated the process of integrating perceptual evidence toward a decision, converging on a number of sequential sampling choice models, such as variants of race and diffusion models and the non-linear leaky competing accumulator (LCA) model. Here we study extensions of these...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tsetsos, K, Usher, M, McClelland, J
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media 2011
_version_ 1826307314712313856
author Tsetsos, K
Usher, M
McClelland, J
author_facet Tsetsos, K
Usher, M
McClelland, J
author_sort Tsetsos, K
collection OXFORD
description Recent research has investigated the process of integrating perceptual evidence toward a decision, converging on a number of sequential sampling choice models, such as variants of race and diffusion models and the non-linear leaky competing accumulator (LCA) model. Here we study extensions of these models to multi-alternative choice, considering how well they can account for data from a psychophysical experiment in which the evidence supporting each of the alternatives changes dynamically during the trial, in a way that creates temporal correlations. We find that participants exhibit a tendency to choose an alternative whose evidence profile is temporally anti-correlated with (or dissimilar from) that of other alternatives. This advantage of the anti-correlated alternative is well accounted for in the LCA, and provides constraints that challenge several other models of multi-alternative choice.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:01:21Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:62530052-3296-463d-a024-6b3e5887d18e
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:01:21Z
publishDate 2011
publisher Frontiers Media
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:62530052-3296-463d-a024-6b3e5887d18e2022-03-29T17:16:52ZTesting multi-alternative decision models with non-stationary evidenceJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:62530052-3296-463d-a024-6b3e5887d18eEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordFrontiers Media2011Tsetsos, KUsher, MMcClelland, JRecent research has investigated the process of integrating perceptual evidence toward a decision, converging on a number of sequential sampling choice models, such as variants of race and diffusion models and the non-linear leaky competing accumulator (LCA) model. Here we study extensions of these models to multi-alternative choice, considering how well they can account for data from a psychophysical experiment in which the evidence supporting each of the alternatives changes dynamically during the trial, in a way that creates temporal correlations. We find that participants exhibit a tendency to choose an alternative whose evidence profile is temporally anti-correlated with (or dissimilar from) that of other alternatives. This advantage of the anti-correlated alternative is well accounted for in the LCA, and provides constraints that challenge several other models of multi-alternative choice.
spellingShingle Tsetsos, K
Usher, M
McClelland, J
Testing multi-alternative decision models with non-stationary evidence
title Testing multi-alternative decision models with non-stationary evidence
title_full Testing multi-alternative decision models with non-stationary evidence
title_fullStr Testing multi-alternative decision models with non-stationary evidence
title_full_unstemmed Testing multi-alternative decision models with non-stationary evidence
title_short Testing multi-alternative decision models with non-stationary evidence
title_sort testing multi alternative decision models with non stationary evidence
work_keys_str_mv AT tsetsosk testingmultialternativedecisionmodelswithnonstationaryevidence
AT usherm testingmultialternativedecisionmodelswithnonstationaryevidence
AT mcclellandj testingmultialternativedecisionmodelswithnonstationaryevidence