Overstating the value of the IUCN Red List for business decision‐making

The relationship between business and conservation is growing increasingly closer, with the recognition that collaboration can lead to better outcomes for biodiversity. Bennun et al. introduce the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (the Red List) to inform businesses' mitigation of biodiversit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Burgass, M, Arlidge, W, Addison, P
Format: Journal article
Published: Wiley 2018
_version_ 1797072076757008384
author Burgass, M
Arlidge, W
Addison, P
author_facet Burgass, M
Arlidge, W
Addison, P
author_sort Burgass, M
collection OXFORD
description The relationship between business and conservation is growing increasingly closer, with the recognition that collaboration can lead to better outcomes for biodiversity. Bennun et al. introduce the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (the Red List) to inform businesses' mitigation of biodiversity impacts; and subsequently how it can be improved to further increase its effectiveness. While we applaud this ever‐closer union of business and conservation, we believe the authors overinflate the value of the Red List in decision‐making, do not account for its limitations and therefore do not justify their conclusions for improving the Red List for business use. We are concerned this focus on wide application of the Red List promotes it as a “one‐stop‐shop” and could lead to discounting of more appropriate approaches.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T23:02:25Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:629bda9b-ce28-4ffb-a9e1-5fa7c7710cab
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T23:02:25Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:629bda9b-ce28-4ffb-a9e1-5fa7c7710cab2022-03-26T18:07:22ZOverstating the value of the IUCN Red List for business decision‐makingJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843uuid:629bda9b-ce28-4ffb-a9e1-5fa7c7710cabSymplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2018Burgass, MArlidge, WAddison, PThe relationship between business and conservation is growing increasingly closer, with the recognition that collaboration can lead to better outcomes for biodiversity. Bennun et al. introduce the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (the Red List) to inform businesses' mitigation of biodiversity impacts; and subsequently how it can be improved to further increase its effectiveness. While we applaud this ever‐closer union of business and conservation, we believe the authors overinflate the value of the Red List in decision‐making, do not account for its limitations and therefore do not justify their conclusions for improving the Red List for business use. We are concerned this focus on wide application of the Red List promotes it as a “one‐stop‐shop” and could lead to discounting of more appropriate approaches.
spellingShingle Burgass, M
Arlidge, W
Addison, P
Overstating the value of the IUCN Red List for business decision‐making
title Overstating the value of the IUCN Red List for business decision‐making
title_full Overstating the value of the IUCN Red List for business decision‐making
title_fullStr Overstating the value of the IUCN Red List for business decision‐making
title_full_unstemmed Overstating the value of the IUCN Red List for business decision‐making
title_short Overstating the value of the IUCN Red List for business decision‐making
title_sort overstating the value of the iucn red list for business decision making
work_keys_str_mv AT burgassm overstatingthevalueoftheiucnredlistforbusinessdecisionmaking
AT arlidgew overstatingthevalueoftheiucnredlistforbusinessdecisionmaking
AT addisonp overstatingthevalueoftheiucnredlistforbusinessdecisionmaking