Image simulations and galaxy fitting in GEMS and STAGES: GALFIT vs GIM2D

In the context of big HST surveys, we present extensive and well tested image simulations to derive the survey detection completeness. We elaborate on the reliability of 2D galaxy fitting codes (GALFIT and GIM2D), which are widely used for morphological galaxy classification (especially for galaxies...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Häußler, B, Barden, M, McIntosh, D
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2008
_version_ 1797072263691894784
author Häußler, B
Barden, M
McIntosh, D
author_facet Häußler, B
Barden, M
McIntosh, D
author_sort Häußler, B
collection OXFORD
description In the context of big HST surveys, we present extensive and well tested image simulations to derive the survey detection completeness. We elaborate on the reliability of 2D galaxy fitting codes (GALFIT and GIM2D), which are widely used for morphological galaxy classification (especially for galaxies at high redshift), but are rarely tested thoroughly. While both codes perform similarly well on bright, big galaxies in these surveys, we find that GALFIT is more robust on faint and small galaxies, especially when used in the context of GALAPAGOS, a script that automates the fitting process successfully. Furthermore, we show that both codes underestimate the true parameter error bars severely. Whereas a Sérsic index cut is not an ideal tool to distinguish between early- and late-type galaxies it is widely used as such. We will point out potential complications in using such a simple automated cut. [1] © 2008 American Institute of Physics.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T23:05:14Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:638bf5d8-4f3c-4e06-baa6-1da3c2270218
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T23:05:14Z
publishDate 2008
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:638bf5d8-4f3c-4e06-baa6-1da3c22702182022-03-26T18:13:41ZImage simulations and galaxy fitting in GEMS and STAGES: GALFIT vs GIM2DJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:638bf5d8-4f3c-4e06-baa6-1da3c2270218EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2008Häußler, BBarden, MMcIntosh, DIn the context of big HST surveys, we present extensive and well tested image simulations to derive the survey detection completeness. We elaborate on the reliability of 2D galaxy fitting codes (GALFIT and GIM2D), which are widely used for morphological galaxy classification (especially for galaxies at high redshift), but are rarely tested thoroughly. While both codes perform similarly well on bright, big galaxies in these surveys, we find that GALFIT is more robust on faint and small galaxies, especially when used in the context of GALAPAGOS, a script that automates the fitting process successfully. Furthermore, we show that both codes underestimate the true parameter error bars severely. Whereas a Sérsic index cut is not an ideal tool to distinguish between early- and late-type galaxies it is widely used as such. We will point out potential complications in using such a simple automated cut. [1] © 2008 American Institute of Physics.
spellingShingle Häußler, B
Barden, M
McIntosh, D
Image simulations and galaxy fitting in GEMS and STAGES: GALFIT vs GIM2D
title Image simulations and galaxy fitting in GEMS and STAGES: GALFIT vs GIM2D
title_full Image simulations and galaxy fitting in GEMS and STAGES: GALFIT vs GIM2D
title_fullStr Image simulations and galaxy fitting in GEMS and STAGES: GALFIT vs GIM2D
title_full_unstemmed Image simulations and galaxy fitting in GEMS and STAGES: GALFIT vs GIM2D
title_short Image simulations and galaxy fitting in GEMS and STAGES: GALFIT vs GIM2D
title_sort image simulations and galaxy fitting in gems and stages galfit vs gim2d
work_keys_str_mv AT haußlerb imagesimulationsandgalaxyfittingingemsandstagesgalfitvsgim2d
AT bardenm imagesimulationsandgalaxyfittingingemsandstagesgalfitvsgim2d
AT mcintoshd imagesimulationsandgalaxyfittingingemsandstagesgalfitvsgim2d