Artificial diffusion for convective and acoustic low Mach number flows I: analysis of the modified equations, and application to Roe-type schemes

<p>Three asymptotic limits exist for the&nbsp;Euler equations&nbsp;at low&nbsp;Mach number&nbsp;- purely convective, purely acoustic, and mixed convective-acoustic. Standard collocated density-based numerical schemes for&nbsp;compressible flow&nbsp;are known to fail at...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hope-Collins, J, di Mare, L
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022
Description
Summary:<p>Three asymptotic limits exist for the&nbsp;Euler equations&nbsp;at low&nbsp;Mach number&nbsp;- purely convective, purely acoustic, and mixed convective-acoustic. Standard collocated density-based numerical schemes for&nbsp;compressible flow&nbsp;are known to fail at low Mach number due to the incorrect asymptotic scaling of the artificial&nbsp;diffusion. Previous studies of this class of schemes have shown a variety of behaviours across the different limits and proposed guidelines for the design of low-Mach schemes. However, these studies have primarily focused on specific&nbsp;discretisations&nbsp;and/or only the convective limit.</p> <p>In this paper, we review the low-Mach behaviour using the modified equations - the continuous Euler equations augmented with artificial diffusion terms - which are representative of a wide range of schemes in this class. By considering both convective and acoustic effects, we show that three diffusion scalings naturally arise. Single- and multiple-scale&nbsp;asymptotic analysis&nbsp;of these scalings shows that many of the important low-Mach features of this class of schemes can be reproduced in a straightforward manner in the continuous setting.</p> <p>As an example, we show that many existing low-Mach Roe-type finite-volume schemes match one of these three scalings. Our analysis corroborates previous analysis of these schemes, and we are able to refine previous guidelines on the design of low-Mach schemes by including both convective and acoustic effects. Discrete analysis and numerical examples demonstrate the behaviour of minimal Roe-type schemes with each of the three scalings for convective, acoustic, and mixed flows.</p>