Follow up after colorectal surgery (the FACS trial)

Follow up after colorectal surgery (the FACS trial)

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Corkhill, A, Primrose, J, Mant, D, Grp, F
Format:	Conference item
Published:	2004

Similar Items

Follow-up after colorectal cancer surgery: Preliminary observational findings from the UK FACS trial
by: Primrose, J, et al.
Published: (2011)

What is the incidence of resectable recurrence after surgery for primary colorectal cancer? Evidence from the UK FACS (Follow-up After Colorectal Surgery) trial
by: Pugh, S, et al.
Published: (2012)

WHAT IS THE TRUE INCIDENCE OF METACHRONOUS COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES? EVIDENCE FROM THE UK FACS (FOLLOW-UP AFTER COLORECTAL SURGERY) TRIAL (ISRCTN: 41458548)
by: Pugh, S, et al.
Published: (2012)

Effect of 3 to 5 years of scheduled CEA and CT follow-up to detect recurrence of colorectal cancer: the FACS randomized clinical trial.
by: Primrose, J, et al.
Published: (2014)

Effect of 3-5 years of scheduled CEA and CT follow-up to detect recurrence of colorectal cancer: FACS randomized controlled trial.
by: Mant, D, et al.
Published: (2013)

Scheduled use of CEA and CT follow-up to detect recurrence of colorectal cancer: 6-12 year results from the FACS randomised controlled trial
by: Pugh, SA, et al.
Published: (2018)

Serum carcinoembryonic antigen trends for diagnosing colorectal cancer recurrence in the FACS randomized clinical trial
by: Shinkins, B, et al.
Published: (2018)

The diagnostic accuracy of a single CEA blood test in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence: Results from the FACS trial.
by: Shinkins, B, et al.
Published: (2017)

Site and stage of colorectal cancer influence the likelihood and distribution of disease recurrence and postrecurrence survival: data from the FACS randomized controlled trial
by: Pugh, SA, et al.
Published: (2016)

A randomised controlled trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of intensive versus no scheduled follow-up in patients who have undergone resection for colorectal cancer with curative intent
by: Mant, D, et al.
Published: (2017)

Surveillance for recurrence of colorectal cancer--reply.
by: Primrose, J, et al.
Published: (2014)

What carcinoembryonic antigen level should trigger further investigation during colorectal cancer follow-up? A systematic review and secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.
by: Shinkins, B, et al.
Published: (2017)

CEA monitoring in colorectal cancer is not a waste of time.
by: Mant, D, et al.
Published: (2014)

Psychological distress at follow-up after major surgery for intra-oral cancer.
by: Espie, C, et al.
Published: (1989)

Urological and colorectal complications following surgery for rectovaginal endometriosis.
by: Slack, A, et al.
Published: (2007)

Development of de novo diabetes in long-term follow-up after bariatric surgery
by: Nor Hanipah, Zubaidah, et al.
Published: (2018)

Authors response to: Urological and colorectal complications following surgery for rectovaginal endometriosis - Reply
by: Slack, A, et al.
Published: (2008)

Routine follow up of breast cancer in primary care: randomised trial.
by: Grunfeld, E, et al.
Published: (1996)

Establishing quality in colorectal surgery.
by: Almoudaris, A, et al.
Published: (2011)

Visceral adiposity is associated with increased risk of anastomotic leakage following surgery for colorectal cancer
by: Yeung, T, et al.
Published: (2011)

Carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring to detect recurrence of colorectal cancer: how should we interpret the test results?
by: Shinkins, B, et al.
Published: (2014)

Follow up in breast cancer. Quality of life unaffected by general practice follow up.
by: Grunfeld, E, et al.
Published: (1995)

Long-term effect of aspirin on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: 20-year follow-up of five randomised trials.
by: Rothwell, P, et al.
Published: (2010)

Hepatic resection following selective internal radiation therapy for colorectal cancer metastases in the FOXFIRE clinical trial: clinical outcomes and distribution of microspheres
by: Winter, H, et al.
Published: (2019)

Follow-up after very preterm birth in Europe
by: Seppänen, A-V, et al.
Published: (2021)

VICTOR: A PHASE III PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF ROFECOXIB IN COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS FOLLOWING SURGICAL RESECTION
by: Midgley, R, et al.
Published: (2008)

Impact of long-term follow-up on revision of knee and hip replacement surgery
by: Kolovos, S, et al.
Published: (2021)

Antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery
by: Alif Gul, Yunus Gul, et al.
Published: (2002)

Colorectal surgery comes in from the cold.
by: Mortensen, N, et al.
Published: (1996)

Synthesis, DFT studies, and reactions of scandium and yttrium dialkyl cations containing neutral fac-N-3 and fac-S-3 donor ligands
by: Tredget, C, et al.
Published: (2008)

A Research Factory for Polymer Microdevices: muFac
by: Hardt, David E., et al.
Published: (2010)

Proceedings of the Facs Seminar on priorities in chemistry in developement of Asia.
by: 470714 FACS Seminar on Priorities in Chemistry in Developement of Asia (1981 : Kuala Lumpur)
Published: (1981)

Integrated manufacturing execution and control system (FacStream) /
by: 381656 Nazri Abdullah
Published: (2001)

Telemonitoring-or better follow-up? Reply
by: McManus, R, et al.
Published: (2010)

Safety and efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to reduce ileus after colorectal surgery
by: EuroSurg Collaborative
Published: (2019)

Follow up care in general practice of patients with myocardial infarction and angina - Reply
by: Mant, D
Published: (1999)

Predicting colorectal cancer risk in patients with rectal bleeding.
by: Robertson, R, et al.
Published: (2006)

Get up and get moving—early mobilisation after hip fracture surgery
by: Sallehuddin, Hakimah, et al.
Published: (2020)

“Johannes fac Totum”?: Shakespeare's first contact with the acting companies
by: Van Es, BB
Published: (2010)

Three-year follow-up of a trial of close contact casting vs surgery for initial treatment of unstable ankle fractures in older adults
by: Keene, D, et al.
Published: (2018)