Investigating acceptance of marine tourism levies, to cover the opportunity costs of conservation for coastal communities

Marine tourism is promoted as a substitute economic activity to unsustainable fishing, which is compatible with conservation. However, benefits of marine tourism do not typically accrue in small-scale fisheries (SSFs), which often bear the costs of conservation; they accrue to tourists and tourist-f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Booth, H, Mourato, S, Milner-Gulland, EJ
Format: Journal article
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Elsevier 2022
_version_ 1826308560035774464
author Booth, H
Mourato, S
Milner-Gulland, EJ
author_facet Booth, H
Mourato, S
Milner-Gulland, EJ
author_sort Booth, H
collection OXFORD
description Marine tourism is promoted as a substitute economic activity to unsustainable fishing, which is compatible with conservation. However, benefits of marine tourism do not typically accrue in small-scale fisheries (SSFs), which often bear the costs of conservation; they accrue to tourists and tourist-focussed businesses. We explored how marine tourism levies could operationalise the beneficiary-pays principle and address these cost-benefit inequities using an online contingent valuation (CV) survey to measure international tourists' willingness-to-pay (WTP) towards community-based shark conservation (N = 1033). Levies were widely supported (96%), with median and Turnbull mean WTP of US$ 10–14.99 and $22.02 per person per day, respectively. We combined these results with data from two marine tourism hotspots in Indonesia – Lombok and Pulau Weh – to explore the feasibility of implementing tourism levies to incentivize pro-conservation behaviour in local SSFs. Our conservative estimates indicate that marine tourism levies in Lombok and Pulau Weh could respectively generate US$ 2.3–10 million and US$ 300,000–1.3 million annually – several times greater than the estimated costs of conservation incentives in local SSFs. The marine tourism industry offers an under-utilised revenue stream for marine conservation, which could support policy aspirations such as ‘a sustainable and equitable blue economy’.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:21:17Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:65bda7b5-8e9d-440c-a7cb-c97beaa16be3
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:21:17Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:65bda7b5-8e9d-440c-a7cb-c97beaa16be32022-10-14T13:33:53ZInvestigating acceptance of marine tourism levies, to cover the opportunity costs of conservation for coastal communitiesJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:65bda7b5-8e9d-440c-a7cb-c97beaa16be3EnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2022Booth, HMourato, SMilner-Gulland, EJMarine tourism is promoted as a substitute economic activity to unsustainable fishing, which is compatible with conservation. However, benefits of marine tourism do not typically accrue in small-scale fisheries (SSFs), which often bear the costs of conservation; they accrue to tourists and tourist-focussed businesses. We explored how marine tourism levies could operationalise the beneficiary-pays principle and address these cost-benefit inequities using an online contingent valuation (CV) survey to measure international tourists' willingness-to-pay (WTP) towards community-based shark conservation (N = 1033). Levies were widely supported (96%), with median and Turnbull mean WTP of US$ 10–14.99 and $22.02 per person per day, respectively. We combined these results with data from two marine tourism hotspots in Indonesia – Lombok and Pulau Weh – to explore the feasibility of implementing tourism levies to incentivize pro-conservation behaviour in local SSFs. Our conservative estimates indicate that marine tourism levies in Lombok and Pulau Weh could respectively generate US$ 2.3–10 million and US$ 300,000–1.3 million annually – several times greater than the estimated costs of conservation incentives in local SSFs. The marine tourism industry offers an under-utilised revenue stream for marine conservation, which could support policy aspirations such as ‘a sustainable and equitable blue economy’.
spellingShingle Booth, H
Mourato, S
Milner-Gulland, EJ
Investigating acceptance of marine tourism levies, to cover the opportunity costs of conservation for coastal communities
title Investigating acceptance of marine tourism levies, to cover the opportunity costs of conservation for coastal communities
title_full Investigating acceptance of marine tourism levies, to cover the opportunity costs of conservation for coastal communities
title_fullStr Investigating acceptance of marine tourism levies, to cover the opportunity costs of conservation for coastal communities
title_full_unstemmed Investigating acceptance of marine tourism levies, to cover the opportunity costs of conservation for coastal communities
title_short Investigating acceptance of marine tourism levies, to cover the opportunity costs of conservation for coastal communities
title_sort investigating acceptance of marine tourism levies to cover the opportunity costs of conservation for coastal communities
work_keys_str_mv AT boothh investigatingacceptanceofmarinetourismleviestocovertheopportunitycostsofconservationforcoastalcommunities
AT mouratos investigatingacceptanceofmarinetourismleviestocovertheopportunitycostsofconservationforcoastalcommunities
AT milnergullandej investigatingacceptanceofmarinetourismleviestocovertheopportunitycostsofconservationforcoastalcommunities