Short- and long-latency interhemispheric inhibitions are additive in human motor cortex.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the human primary motor cortex (M1) at suprathreshold strength results in inhibition of M1 in the opposite hemisphere, a process termed interhemispheric inhibition (IHI). Two phases of IHI, termed short-latency interhemispheric inhibition (SIHI) and long-la...

Бүрэн тодорхойлолт

Номзүйн дэлгэрэнгүй
Үндсэн зохиолчид: Ghosh, S, Mehta, A, Huang, G, Gunraj, C, Hoque, T, Saha, U, Ni, Z, Chen, R
Формат: Journal article
Хэл сонгох:English
Хэвлэсэн: 2013
_version_ 1826276416374702080
author Ghosh, S
Mehta, A
Huang, G
Gunraj, C
Hoque, T
Saha, U
Ni, Z
Chen, R
author_facet Ghosh, S
Mehta, A
Huang, G
Gunraj, C
Hoque, T
Saha, U
Ni, Z
Chen, R
author_sort Ghosh, S
collection OXFORD
description Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the human primary motor cortex (M1) at suprathreshold strength results in inhibition of M1 in the opposite hemisphere, a process termed interhemispheric inhibition (IHI). Two phases of IHI, termed short-latency interhemispheric inhibition (SIHI) and long-latency interhemispheric inhibition (LIHI), involving separate neural circuits, have been identified. In this study we evaluated how these two inhibitory processes interact with each other. We studied 10 healthy right-handed subjects. A test stimulus (TS) was delivered to the left M1, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. Contralateral conditioning stimuli (CCS) were applied to the right M1 either 10 ms or 50 ms prior to the TS, inducing SIHI and LIHI, respectively, in the left M1. The effects of SIHI and LIHI alone, and SIHI and LIHI delivered together, were compared. The TS was adjusted to produce 1-mV or 0.5-mV MEPs when applied alone or after CCS. SIHI and LIHI were found to be additive when delivered together, irrespective of the strength of the TS. The interactions were affected neither by varying the strength of the conditioning stimulus producing SIHI nor by altering the current direction of the TS. Small or opposing interactions, however, may not have been detected. These results support previous findings suggesting that SIHI and LIHI act through different neural circuits. Such inhibitory processes may be used individually or additively during motor tasks and should be studied as separate processes in functional studies.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T23:13:38Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:665c55ea-b123-44a9-b82f-bbbe8b819f40
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T23:13:38Z
publishDate 2013
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:665c55ea-b123-44a9-b82f-bbbe8b819f402022-03-26T18:31:23ZShort- and long-latency interhemispheric inhibitions are additive in human motor cortex.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:665c55ea-b123-44a9-b82f-bbbe8b819f40EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2013Ghosh, SMehta, AHuang, GGunraj, CHoque, TSaha, UNi, ZChen, RTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the human primary motor cortex (M1) at suprathreshold strength results in inhibition of M1 in the opposite hemisphere, a process termed interhemispheric inhibition (IHI). Two phases of IHI, termed short-latency interhemispheric inhibition (SIHI) and long-latency interhemispheric inhibition (LIHI), involving separate neural circuits, have been identified. In this study we evaluated how these two inhibitory processes interact with each other. We studied 10 healthy right-handed subjects. A test stimulus (TS) was delivered to the left M1, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. Contralateral conditioning stimuli (CCS) were applied to the right M1 either 10 ms or 50 ms prior to the TS, inducing SIHI and LIHI, respectively, in the left M1. The effects of SIHI and LIHI alone, and SIHI and LIHI delivered together, were compared. The TS was adjusted to produce 1-mV or 0.5-mV MEPs when applied alone or after CCS. SIHI and LIHI were found to be additive when delivered together, irrespective of the strength of the TS. The interactions were affected neither by varying the strength of the conditioning stimulus producing SIHI nor by altering the current direction of the TS. Small or opposing interactions, however, may not have been detected. These results support previous findings suggesting that SIHI and LIHI act through different neural circuits. Such inhibitory processes may be used individually or additively during motor tasks and should be studied as separate processes in functional studies.
spellingShingle Ghosh, S
Mehta, A
Huang, G
Gunraj, C
Hoque, T
Saha, U
Ni, Z
Chen, R
Short- and long-latency interhemispheric inhibitions are additive in human motor cortex.
title Short- and long-latency interhemispheric inhibitions are additive in human motor cortex.
title_full Short- and long-latency interhemispheric inhibitions are additive in human motor cortex.
title_fullStr Short- and long-latency interhemispheric inhibitions are additive in human motor cortex.
title_full_unstemmed Short- and long-latency interhemispheric inhibitions are additive in human motor cortex.
title_short Short- and long-latency interhemispheric inhibitions are additive in human motor cortex.
title_sort short and long latency interhemispheric inhibitions are additive in human motor cortex
work_keys_str_mv AT ghoshs shortandlonglatencyinterhemisphericinhibitionsareadditiveinhumanmotorcortex
AT mehtaa shortandlonglatencyinterhemisphericinhibitionsareadditiveinhumanmotorcortex
AT huangg shortandlonglatencyinterhemisphericinhibitionsareadditiveinhumanmotorcortex
AT gunrajc shortandlonglatencyinterhemisphericinhibitionsareadditiveinhumanmotorcortex
AT hoquet shortandlonglatencyinterhemisphericinhibitionsareadditiveinhumanmotorcortex
AT sahau shortandlonglatencyinterhemisphericinhibitionsareadditiveinhumanmotorcortex
AT niz shortandlonglatencyinterhemisphericinhibitionsareadditiveinhumanmotorcortex
AT chenr shortandlonglatencyinterhemisphericinhibitionsareadditiveinhumanmotorcortex