The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the degree of scatter of reports of randomised trials and systematic reviews, and how the scatter differs among medical specialties and subspecialties. DESIGN: Cross sectional analysis. DATA SOURCE: PubMed for all disease relevant randomised trials and systematic reviews publ...
Main Authors: | Hoffmann, T, Erueti, C, Thorning, S, Glasziou, P |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Similar Items
-
Are systematic reviews more cost-effective than randomised trials?
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2006) -
Computerised reminders and feedback in medication management: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
by: Bennett, J, et al.
Published: (2003) -
Systematic comparison of Mendelian randomisation studies and randomised controlled trials using electronic databases
by: Jie Zheng, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
by: Hopewell, S, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Can we rely on the best trial? A comparison of individual trials and systematic reviews.
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2010)