Proportionality, wrongs and equipoise for natural immunity exemptions: response to commentators
We would like to thank each of the commentators on our feature article for their thoughtful engagement with our arguments. All the commentaries raise important questions about our proposed justification for natural immunity exemptions to COVID-19 vaccine mandates. Thankfully, for some of the points...
Main Authors: | Pugh, J, Savulescu, J, Brown, RCH, Wilkinson, D |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Similar Items
-
The ethics of natural immunity exemptions to vaccine mandates: the Supreme Court petition
by: Pugh, J, et al.
Published: (2024) -
The unnaturalistic fallacy: COVID-19 vaccine mandates should not discriminate against natural immunity
by: Pugh, J, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Home Address Exemptions are the Wrong Approach in Protecting Privacy
by: David Cuillier
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Glycemic equipoise
by: Sanjay Kalra, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
A public health ethic should inform policies on COVID-19 immunity passports – authors' reply
by: Brown, RCH, et al.
Published: (2020)