Associations of event-related brain potentials and Alzheimer’s disease severity: a longitudinal study
<br><strong>Background: </strong>So far, no cost-efficient, widely-used biomarkers have been established to facilitate the objectivization of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnosis and monitoring. Research suggests that event-related potentials (ERPs) reflect neurodegenerative processe...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2018
|
| _version_ | 1797073003663589376 |
|---|---|
| author | Fruehwirt, W Dorffner, G Roberts, S Gerstgrasser, M Grossegger, D Schmidt, R Dal-Bianco, P Ransmayr, G Garn, H Waser, M Benke, T |
| author_facet | Fruehwirt, W Dorffner, G Roberts, S Gerstgrasser, M Grossegger, D Schmidt, R Dal-Bianco, P Ransmayr, G Garn, H Waser, M Benke, T |
| author_sort | Fruehwirt, W |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <br><strong>Background: </strong>So far, no cost-efficient, widely-used biomarkers have been established to facilitate the objectivization of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnosis and monitoring. Research suggests that event-related potentials (ERPs) reflect neurodegenerative processes in AD and might qualify as neurophysiological AD markers.</br>
<br><strong>Objectives: </strong>First, to examine which ERP component correlates the most with AD severity, as measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Then, to analyze the temporal change of this component as AD progresses.</br>
<br><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-three subjects (31 with possible, 32 with probable AD diagnosis) were recruited as part of the cohort study Prospective Dementia Registry Austria (PRODEM). For a maximum of 18 months patients revisited every 6 months for follow-up assessments. ERPs were elicited using an auditory oddball paradigm. P300 and N200 latency was determined with regard to target as well as difference wave ERPs, whereas P50 amplitude was measured from standard stimuli waveforms.</br>
<br><strong>Results: </strong>P300 latency exhibited the strongest association with AD severity (e.g., r = –0.512, p < 0.01 at Pz for target stimuli in probable AD subjects). Further, there were significant Pearson correlations for N200 latency (e.g., r = –0.407, p = 0.026 at Cz for difference waves in probable AD subjects). P50 amplitude, as measured by different detection methods and at various scalp sites, did not significantly correlate with disease severity – neither in probable AD, possible AD, nor in both subgroups of patients combined. ERP markers for the group of possible AD patients did not show any significant correlations with MMSE scores. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons between baseline and 18-months follow-up assessment revealed significant P300 latency differences (e.g., p < 0.001 at Cz for difference waves in probable AD subjects). However, there were no significant correlations between the change rates of P300 latency and MMSE score.</br>
<br><strong>Conclusions: </strong>P300 and N200 latency significantly correlated with disease severity in probable AD, whereas P50 amplitude did not. P300 latency, which showed the highest correlation coefficients with MMSE, significantly increased over the course of the 18 months study period in probable AD patients. The magnitude of the observed prolongation is in line with other longitudinal AD studies and substantially higher than in normal ageing, as reported in previous trials (no healthy controls were included in our study).</br>
|
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:15:51Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:67197883-e4ac-4b27-b8e4-2b08454bed98 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:15:51Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:67197883-e4ac-4b27-b8e4-2b08454bed982022-03-26T18:36:09ZAssociations of event-related brain potentials and Alzheimer’s disease severity: a longitudinal studyJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:67197883-e4ac-4b27-b8e4-2b08454bed98EnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2018Fruehwirt, WDorffner, GRoberts, SGerstgrasser, MGrossegger, DSchmidt, RDal-Bianco, PRansmayr, GGarn, HWaser, MBenke, T<br><strong>Background: </strong>So far, no cost-efficient, widely-used biomarkers have been established to facilitate the objectivization of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnosis and monitoring. Research suggests that event-related potentials (ERPs) reflect neurodegenerative processes in AD and might qualify as neurophysiological AD markers.</br> <br><strong>Objectives: </strong>First, to examine which ERP component correlates the most with AD severity, as measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Then, to analyze the temporal change of this component as AD progresses.</br> <br><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-three subjects (31 with possible, 32 with probable AD diagnosis) were recruited as part of the cohort study Prospective Dementia Registry Austria (PRODEM). For a maximum of 18 months patients revisited every 6 months for follow-up assessments. ERPs were elicited using an auditory oddball paradigm. P300 and N200 latency was determined with regard to target as well as difference wave ERPs, whereas P50 amplitude was measured from standard stimuli waveforms.</br> <br><strong>Results: </strong>P300 latency exhibited the strongest association with AD severity (e.g., r = –0.512, p < 0.01 at Pz for target stimuli in probable AD subjects). Further, there were significant Pearson correlations for N200 latency (e.g., r = –0.407, p = 0.026 at Cz for difference waves in probable AD subjects). P50 amplitude, as measured by different detection methods and at various scalp sites, did not significantly correlate with disease severity – neither in probable AD, possible AD, nor in both subgroups of patients combined. ERP markers for the group of possible AD patients did not show any significant correlations with MMSE scores. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons between baseline and 18-months follow-up assessment revealed significant P300 latency differences (e.g., p < 0.001 at Cz for difference waves in probable AD subjects). However, there were no significant correlations between the change rates of P300 latency and MMSE score.</br> <br><strong>Conclusions: </strong>P300 and N200 latency significantly correlated with disease severity in probable AD, whereas P50 amplitude did not. P300 latency, which showed the highest correlation coefficients with MMSE, significantly increased over the course of the 18 months study period in probable AD patients. The magnitude of the observed prolongation is in line with other longitudinal AD studies and substantially higher than in normal ageing, as reported in previous trials (no healthy controls were included in our study).</br> |
| spellingShingle | Fruehwirt, W Dorffner, G Roberts, S Gerstgrasser, M Grossegger, D Schmidt, R Dal-Bianco, P Ransmayr, G Garn, H Waser, M Benke, T Associations of event-related brain potentials and Alzheimer’s disease severity: a longitudinal study |
| title | Associations of event-related brain potentials and Alzheimer’s disease severity: a longitudinal study |
| title_full | Associations of event-related brain potentials and Alzheimer’s disease severity: a longitudinal study |
| title_fullStr | Associations of event-related brain potentials and Alzheimer’s disease severity: a longitudinal study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Associations of event-related brain potentials and Alzheimer’s disease severity: a longitudinal study |
| title_short | Associations of event-related brain potentials and Alzheimer’s disease severity: a longitudinal study |
| title_sort | associations of event related brain potentials and alzheimer s disease severity a longitudinal study |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fruehwirtw associationsofeventrelatedbrainpotentialsandalzheimersdiseaseseverityalongitudinalstudy AT dorffnerg associationsofeventrelatedbrainpotentialsandalzheimersdiseaseseverityalongitudinalstudy AT robertss associationsofeventrelatedbrainpotentialsandalzheimersdiseaseseverityalongitudinalstudy AT gerstgrasserm associationsofeventrelatedbrainpotentialsandalzheimersdiseaseseverityalongitudinalstudy AT grosseggerd associationsofeventrelatedbrainpotentialsandalzheimersdiseaseseverityalongitudinalstudy AT schmidtr associationsofeventrelatedbrainpotentialsandalzheimersdiseaseseverityalongitudinalstudy AT dalbiancop associationsofeventrelatedbrainpotentialsandalzheimersdiseaseseverityalongitudinalstudy AT ransmayrg associationsofeventrelatedbrainpotentialsandalzheimersdiseaseseverityalongitudinalstudy AT garnh associationsofeventrelatedbrainpotentialsandalzheimersdiseaseseverityalongitudinalstudy AT waserm associationsofeventrelatedbrainpotentialsandalzheimersdiseaseseverityalongitudinalstudy AT benket associationsofeventrelatedbrainpotentialsandalzheimersdiseaseseverityalongitudinalstudy |