ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk

We show that engagement on environmental, social, and governance issues can benefit shareholders by reducing firms’ downside risks. We find that the risk reductions (measured using value at risk [VaR] and lower partial moments) vary across engagement types and success rates. Engagement is most effec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hoepner, AGF, Oikonomou, I, Sautner, Z, Starks, LT, Zhou, XY
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2023
_version_ 1811139614751064064
author Hoepner, AGF
Oikonomou, I
Sautner, Z
Starks, LT
Zhou, XY
author_facet Hoepner, AGF
Oikonomou, I
Sautner, Z
Starks, LT
Zhou, XY
author_sort Hoepner, AGF
collection OXFORD
description We show that engagement on environmental, social, and governance issues can benefit shareholders by reducing firms’ downside risks. We find that the risk reductions (measured using value at risk [VaR] and lower partial moments) vary across engagement types and success rates. Engagement is most effective in lowering downside risk when addressing environmental topics (primarily climate change). Further, targets with large downside risk reductions exhibit a decrease in environmental incidents after the engagement. We estimate that the VaR of engagement targets decreases by 9 percent of the standard deviation after successful engagements, relative to control firms.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T08:26:09Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:6728139a-9a5e-4d7a-af18-b36245d67a0c
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-25T04:08:53Z
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:6728139a-9a5e-4d7a-af18-b36245d67a0c2024-06-07T10:05:00ZESG shareholder engagement and downside riskJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:6728139a-9a5e-4d7a-af18-b36245d67a0cEnglishSymplectic ElementsOxford University Press2023Hoepner, AGFOikonomou, ISautner, ZStarks, LTZhou, XYWe show that engagement on environmental, social, and governance issues can benefit shareholders by reducing firms’ downside risks. We find that the risk reductions (measured using value at risk [VaR] and lower partial moments) vary across engagement types and success rates. Engagement is most effective in lowering downside risk when addressing environmental topics (primarily climate change). Further, targets with large downside risk reductions exhibit a decrease in environmental incidents after the engagement. We estimate that the VaR of engagement targets decreases by 9 percent of the standard deviation after successful engagements, relative to control firms.
spellingShingle Hoepner, AGF
Oikonomou, I
Sautner, Z
Starks, LT
Zhou, XY
ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk
title ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk
title_full ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk
title_fullStr ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk
title_full_unstemmed ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk
title_short ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk
title_sort esg shareholder engagement and downside risk
work_keys_str_mv AT hoepneragf esgshareholderengagementanddownsiderisk
AT oikonomoui esgshareholderengagementanddownsiderisk
AT sautnerz esgshareholderengagementanddownsiderisk
AT starkslt esgshareholderengagementanddownsiderisk
AT zhouxy esgshareholderengagementanddownsiderisk