The timescale of perceptual evidence integration can be adapted to the environment.
A key computation underlying perceptual decisions is the temporal integration of "evidence" in favor of different states of the world. Studies from psychology and neuroscience have shown that observers integrate multiple samples of noisy perceptual evidence over time toward a decision. An...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2013
|
| _version_ | 1797073024797638656 |
|---|---|
| author | Ossmy, O Moran, R Pfeffer, T Tsetsos, K Usher, M Donner, T |
| author_facet | Ossmy, O Moran, R Pfeffer, T Tsetsos, K Usher, M Donner, T |
| author_sort | Ossmy, O |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | A key computation underlying perceptual decisions is the temporal integration of "evidence" in favor of different states of the world. Studies from psychology and neuroscience have shown that observers integrate multiple samples of noisy perceptual evidence over time toward a decision. An influential model posits perfect evidence integration (i.e., without forgetting), enabling optimal decisions based on stationary evidence. However, in real-life environments, the perceptual evidence typically changes continuously. We used a computational model to show that, under such conditions, performance can be improved by means of leaky (forgetful) integration, if the integration timescale is adapted toward the predominant signal duration. We then tested whether human observers employ such an adaptive integration process. Observers had to detect visual luminance "signals" of variable strength, duration, and onset latency, embedded within longer streams of noise. Different sessions entailed predominantly short or long signals. The rate of performance improvement as a function of signal duration indicated that observers indeed changed their integration timescale with the predominant signal duration, in accordance with the adaptive integration account. Our findings establish that leaky integration of perceptual evidence is flexible and that cognitive control mechanisms can exploit this flexibility for optimizing the decision process. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:16:05Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:672cbc9e-6933-45bd-b611-e056e376a9b2 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:16:05Z |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:672cbc9e-6933-45bd-b611-e056e376a9b22022-03-26T18:36:32ZThe timescale of perceptual evidence integration can be adapted to the environment.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:672cbc9e-6933-45bd-b611-e056e376a9b2EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2013Ossmy, OMoran, RPfeffer, TTsetsos, KUsher, MDonner, TA key computation underlying perceptual decisions is the temporal integration of "evidence" in favor of different states of the world. Studies from psychology and neuroscience have shown that observers integrate multiple samples of noisy perceptual evidence over time toward a decision. An influential model posits perfect evidence integration (i.e., without forgetting), enabling optimal decisions based on stationary evidence. However, in real-life environments, the perceptual evidence typically changes continuously. We used a computational model to show that, under such conditions, performance can be improved by means of leaky (forgetful) integration, if the integration timescale is adapted toward the predominant signal duration. We then tested whether human observers employ such an adaptive integration process. Observers had to detect visual luminance "signals" of variable strength, duration, and onset latency, embedded within longer streams of noise. Different sessions entailed predominantly short or long signals. The rate of performance improvement as a function of signal duration indicated that observers indeed changed their integration timescale with the predominant signal duration, in accordance with the adaptive integration account. Our findings establish that leaky integration of perceptual evidence is flexible and that cognitive control mechanisms can exploit this flexibility for optimizing the decision process. |
| spellingShingle | Ossmy, O Moran, R Pfeffer, T Tsetsos, K Usher, M Donner, T The timescale of perceptual evidence integration can be adapted to the environment. |
| title | The timescale of perceptual evidence integration can be adapted to the environment. |
| title_full | The timescale of perceptual evidence integration can be adapted to the environment. |
| title_fullStr | The timescale of perceptual evidence integration can be adapted to the environment. |
| title_full_unstemmed | The timescale of perceptual evidence integration can be adapted to the environment. |
| title_short | The timescale of perceptual evidence integration can be adapted to the environment. |
| title_sort | timescale of perceptual evidence integration can be adapted to the environment |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ossmyo thetimescaleofperceptualevidenceintegrationcanbeadaptedtotheenvironment AT moranr thetimescaleofperceptualevidenceintegrationcanbeadaptedtotheenvironment AT pfeffert thetimescaleofperceptualevidenceintegrationcanbeadaptedtotheenvironment AT tsetsosk thetimescaleofperceptualevidenceintegrationcanbeadaptedtotheenvironment AT usherm thetimescaleofperceptualevidenceintegrationcanbeadaptedtotheenvironment AT donnert thetimescaleofperceptualevidenceintegrationcanbeadaptedtotheenvironment AT ossmyo timescaleofperceptualevidenceintegrationcanbeadaptedtotheenvironment AT moranr timescaleofperceptualevidenceintegrationcanbeadaptedtotheenvironment AT pfeffert timescaleofperceptualevidenceintegrationcanbeadaptedtotheenvironment AT tsetsosk timescaleofperceptualevidenceintegrationcanbeadaptedtotheenvironment AT usherm timescaleofperceptualevidenceintegrationcanbeadaptedtotheenvironment AT donnert timescaleofperceptualevidenceintegrationcanbeadaptedtotheenvironment |