The Carbon Removal Budget: theory and practice
Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is a necessary complement to emissions reductions to achieve a state of global net zero emissions and stabilise future warming. Despite its utility, CDR remains poorly understood. Due to a range of constraints, CDR is a fundamentally finite resource, which we currently d...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor and Francis Group
2024
|
| _version_ | 1811140243389153280 |
|---|---|
| author | Caldecott, B Johnstone, I |
| author_facet | Caldecott, B Johnstone, I |
| author_sort | Caldecott, B |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is a necessary complement to emissions reductions to achieve a state of global net zero emissions and stabilise future warming. Despite its utility, CDR remains poorly understood. Due to a range of constraints, CDR is a fundamentally finite resource, which we currently do not have enough of to achieve and go beyond global net zero. This has wide-ranging but underexplored implications for the technical and economic feasibility of our collective net zero transition. At the same time, both the opportunity and obligation to undertake CDR are not equally distributed amongst actors and geographies. As a result, there are ongoing questions as to how we can increase the supply of quality CDR whilst at the same time ensure equitable distribution of that same CDR, both within and between countries and non-state actors. To explore these phenomena, we introduce and define the concept of a Carbon Removal Budget (CRB), illustrate how it can apply to different contexts and scales, and distinguish it from the related but distinct concept of the carbon budget. We further estimate the global CRB, review its constraints and quality considerations and outline potential utilisation pathways and principles. We then examine the potential application of the CRB as a tool on which both public and private decision-makers can use to assess the feasibility of their nationally determined contributions and/or net-zero transition plans. In this manner, we illustrate how CRB forecasts can be used today to help build the net zero future of tomorrow. |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:18:53Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:676ad0e6-375d-4ea5-a132-7a235f58eed5 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:18:53Z |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:676ad0e6-375d-4ea5-a132-7a235f58eed52024-07-26T19:34:54ZThe Carbon Removal Budget: theory and practiceJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:676ad0e6-375d-4ea5-a132-7a235f58eed5EnglishJisc Publications RouterTaylor and Francis Group2024Caldecott, BJohnstone, ICarbon dioxide removal (CDR) is a necessary complement to emissions reductions to achieve a state of global net zero emissions and stabilise future warming. Despite its utility, CDR remains poorly understood. Due to a range of constraints, CDR is a fundamentally finite resource, which we currently do not have enough of to achieve and go beyond global net zero. This has wide-ranging but underexplored implications for the technical and economic feasibility of our collective net zero transition. At the same time, both the opportunity and obligation to undertake CDR are not equally distributed amongst actors and geographies. As a result, there are ongoing questions as to how we can increase the supply of quality CDR whilst at the same time ensure equitable distribution of that same CDR, both within and between countries and non-state actors. To explore these phenomena, we introduce and define the concept of a Carbon Removal Budget (CRB), illustrate how it can apply to different contexts and scales, and distinguish it from the related but distinct concept of the carbon budget. We further estimate the global CRB, review its constraints and quality considerations and outline potential utilisation pathways and principles. We then examine the potential application of the CRB as a tool on which both public and private decision-makers can use to assess the feasibility of their nationally determined contributions and/or net-zero transition plans. In this manner, we illustrate how CRB forecasts can be used today to help build the net zero future of tomorrow. |
| spellingShingle | Caldecott, B Johnstone, I The Carbon Removal Budget: theory and practice |
| title | The Carbon Removal Budget: theory and practice |
| title_full | The Carbon Removal Budget: theory and practice |
| title_fullStr | The Carbon Removal Budget: theory and practice |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Carbon Removal Budget: theory and practice |
| title_short | The Carbon Removal Budget: theory and practice |
| title_sort | carbon removal budget theory and practice |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT caldecottb thecarbonremovalbudgettheoryandpractice AT johnstonei thecarbonremovalbudgettheoryandpractice AT caldecottb carbonremovalbudgettheoryandpractice AT johnstonei carbonremovalbudgettheoryandpractice |