The implications of natural resource exports for non-resource trade

Foreign exchange windfalls such as those from natural resource revenues change non-resource exports, imports, and the capital account. We study the balance between these responses and show that the response to $1 of resource revenue is, for our preferred estimates, to decrease non-resource exports b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Venables, A, Harding, T
Format: Working paper
Published: University of Oxford 2013
_version_ 1826276839934394368
author Venables, A
Harding, T
author_facet Venables, A
Harding, T
author_sort Venables, A
collection OXFORD
description Foreign exchange windfalls such as those from natural resource revenues change non-resource exports, imports, and the capital account. We study the balance between these responses and show that the response to $1 of resource revenue is, for our preferred estimates, to decrease non-resource exports by 74 cents and increase imports by 23 cents, implying a negligible effect on foreign saving. The negative per $1 impact on exports is larger for manufactures than for other sectors, and particularly large for internationally mobile manufacturing sectors. While standard Dutch disease analysis points to contraction of the tradable sector as a whole, division into non-resource exports and imports is important if, as suggested by much development literature, a higher share of exports to GDP is associated with faster growth. The large negative impact of resources on these exports points to the difficulty resource rich economies face in diversifying their exports.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T23:19:52Z
format Working paper
id oxford-uuid:68609894-f9b9-44ac-af84-c3c851736b1c
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T23:19:52Z
publishDate 2013
publisher University of Oxford
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:68609894-f9b9-44ac-af84-c3c851736b1c2022-03-26T18:44:26ZThe implications of natural resource exports for non-resource tradeWorking paperhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042uuid:68609894-f9b9-44ac-af84-c3c851736b1cSymplectic ElementsBulk import via SwordUniversity of Oxford2013Venables, AHarding, TForeign exchange windfalls such as those from natural resource revenues change non-resource exports, imports, and the capital account. We study the balance between these responses and show that the response to $1 of resource revenue is, for our preferred estimates, to decrease non-resource exports by 74 cents and increase imports by 23 cents, implying a negligible effect on foreign saving. The negative per $1 impact on exports is larger for manufactures than for other sectors, and particularly large for internationally mobile manufacturing sectors. While standard Dutch disease analysis points to contraction of the tradable sector as a whole, division into non-resource exports and imports is important if, as suggested by much development literature, a higher share of exports to GDP is associated with faster growth. The large negative impact of resources on these exports points to the difficulty resource rich economies face in diversifying their exports.
spellingShingle Venables, A
Harding, T
The implications of natural resource exports for non-resource trade
title The implications of natural resource exports for non-resource trade
title_full The implications of natural resource exports for non-resource trade
title_fullStr The implications of natural resource exports for non-resource trade
title_full_unstemmed The implications of natural resource exports for non-resource trade
title_short The implications of natural resource exports for non-resource trade
title_sort implications of natural resource exports for non resource trade
work_keys_str_mv AT venablesa theimplicationsofnaturalresourceexportsfornonresourcetrade
AT hardingt theimplicationsofnaturalresourceexportsfornonresourcetrade
AT venablesa implicationsofnaturalresourceexportsfornonresourcetrade
AT hardingt implicationsofnaturalresourceexportsfornonresourcetrade