China and comparative international law: between social science and critique

This Essay brings Abebe, Chilton, and Ginsburg’s Lead Essay into conversation with the literature on comparative international law to ask whether the social scientific approach to international law is “international.” In particular, this Essay takes the case of scholarship on international law in Ch...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Erie, MS
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: University of Chicago Law School 2021
_version_ 1797073382245662720
author Erie, MS
author_facet Erie, MS
author_sort Erie, MS
collection OXFORD
description This Essay brings Abebe, Chilton, and Ginsburg’s Lead Essay into conversation with the literature on comparative international law to ask whether the social scientific approach to international law is “international.” In particular, this Essay takes the case of scholarship on international law in China to examine why or why not particular methodological and theoretical perspectives on international law may gain traction in certain jurisdictions’ legal academies. There are a number of linguistic, pedagogic, institutional, and, ultimately, political reasons why the Chinese scholarship that uses social science to understand international law is still nascent. At the same time, critical approaches to international law in the Chinese literature are ascendant. This Essay explains these divergent trends through a sociology of knowledge lens and offers provisional thoughts about future trajectories for the study of international law in a period during which China’s influence on the international system will most likely grow.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T23:21:18Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:68cfb904-f18f-4ecb-ba87-0dc936f92d73
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T23:21:18Z
publishDate 2021
publisher University of Chicago Law School
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:68cfb904-f18f-4ecb-ba87-0dc936f92d732022-03-26T18:47:33ZChina and comparative international law: between social science and critiqueJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:68cfb904-f18f-4ecb-ba87-0dc936f92d73EnglishSymplectic ElementsUniversity of Chicago Law School2021Erie, MSThis Essay brings Abebe, Chilton, and Ginsburg’s Lead Essay into conversation with the literature on comparative international law to ask whether the social scientific approach to international law is “international.” In particular, this Essay takes the case of scholarship on international law in China to examine why or why not particular methodological and theoretical perspectives on international law may gain traction in certain jurisdictions’ legal academies. There are a number of linguistic, pedagogic, institutional, and, ultimately, political reasons why the Chinese scholarship that uses social science to understand international law is still nascent. At the same time, critical approaches to international law in the Chinese literature are ascendant. This Essay explains these divergent trends through a sociology of knowledge lens and offers provisional thoughts about future trajectories for the study of international law in a period during which China’s influence on the international system will most likely grow.
spellingShingle Erie, MS
China and comparative international law: between social science and critique
title China and comparative international law: between social science and critique
title_full China and comparative international law: between social science and critique
title_fullStr China and comparative international law: between social science and critique
title_full_unstemmed China and comparative international law: between social science and critique
title_short China and comparative international law: between social science and critique
title_sort china and comparative international law between social science and critique
work_keys_str_mv AT eriems chinaandcomparativeinternationallawbetweensocialscienceandcritique