The effect of computer-aided detection markers on visual search and reader performance during concurrent reading of CT colonography.
We aimed to identify the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) on visual search and performance in CT Colonography (CTC) of inexperienced and experienced readers.Fifteen endoluminal CTC examinations were recorded, each with one polyp, and two videos were generated, one with and one without a CAD...
| المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| التنسيق: | Journal article |
| اللغة: | English |
| منشور في: |
2015
|
| _version_ | 1826276971474059264 |
|---|---|
| author | Helbren, E Fanshawe, T Phillips, P Mallett, S Boone, D Gale, A Altman, D Taylor, SA Manning, D Halligan, S |
| author_facet | Helbren, E Fanshawe, T Phillips, P Mallett, S Boone, D Gale, A Altman, D Taylor, SA Manning, D Halligan, S |
| author_sort | Helbren, E |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | We aimed to identify the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) on visual search and performance in CT Colonography (CTC) of inexperienced and experienced readers.Fifteen endoluminal CTC examinations were recorded, each with one polyp, and two videos were generated, one with and one without a CAD mark. Forty-two readers (17 experienced, 25 inexperienced) interpreted the videos during infrared visual search recording. CAD markers and polyps were treated as regions of interest in data processing. This multi-reader, multi-case study was analysed using multilevel modelling.CAD drew readers' attention to polyps faster, accelerating identification times: median 'time to first pursuit' was 0.48 s (IQR 0.27 to 0.87 s) with CAD, versus 0.58 s (IQR 0.35 to 1.06 s) without. For inexperienced readers, CAD also held visual attention for longer. All visual search metrics used to assess visual gaze behaviour demonstrated statistically significant differences when "with" and "without" CAD were compared. A significant increase in the number of correct polyp identifications across all readers was seen with CAD (74 % without CAD, 87 % with CAD; p < 0.001).CAD significantly alters visual search and polyp identification in readers viewing three-dimensional endoluminal CTC. For polyp and CAD marker pursuit times, CAD generally exerted a larger effect on inexperienced readers.• Visual gaze is attracted by computer-assisted detection (CAD) marks on polyps • Inexperienced readers' gaze is affected more by CAD than experienced readers. • CAD marks could mean that the unannotated endoluminal surface is relatively neglected. • Correct polyp identification is increased significantly by CAD. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:21:52Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:68fecfb1-dda8-42f6-a3ad-9a0cf6191bd1 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:21:52Z |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:68fecfb1-dda8-42f6-a3ad-9a0cf6191bd12022-03-26T18:48:37ZThe effect of computer-aided detection markers on visual search and reader performance during concurrent reading of CT colonography.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:68fecfb1-dda8-42f6-a3ad-9a0cf6191bd1EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2015Helbren, EFanshawe, TPhillips, PMallett, SBoone, DGale, AAltman, DTaylor, SAManning, DHalligan, SWe aimed to identify the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) on visual search and performance in CT Colonography (CTC) of inexperienced and experienced readers.Fifteen endoluminal CTC examinations were recorded, each with one polyp, and two videos were generated, one with and one without a CAD mark. Forty-two readers (17 experienced, 25 inexperienced) interpreted the videos during infrared visual search recording. CAD markers and polyps were treated as regions of interest in data processing. This multi-reader, multi-case study was analysed using multilevel modelling.CAD drew readers' attention to polyps faster, accelerating identification times: median 'time to first pursuit' was 0.48 s (IQR 0.27 to 0.87 s) with CAD, versus 0.58 s (IQR 0.35 to 1.06 s) without. For inexperienced readers, CAD also held visual attention for longer. All visual search metrics used to assess visual gaze behaviour demonstrated statistically significant differences when "with" and "without" CAD were compared. A significant increase in the number of correct polyp identifications across all readers was seen with CAD (74 % without CAD, 87 % with CAD; p < 0.001).CAD significantly alters visual search and polyp identification in readers viewing three-dimensional endoluminal CTC. For polyp and CAD marker pursuit times, CAD generally exerted a larger effect on inexperienced readers.• Visual gaze is attracted by computer-assisted detection (CAD) marks on polyps • Inexperienced readers' gaze is affected more by CAD than experienced readers. • CAD marks could mean that the unannotated endoluminal surface is relatively neglected. • Correct polyp identification is increased significantly by CAD. |
| spellingShingle | Helbren, E Fanshawe, T Phillips, P Mallett, S Boone, D Gale, A Altman, D Taylor, SA Manning, D Halligan, S The effect of computer-aided detection markers on visual search and reader performance during concurrent reading of CT colonography. |
| title | The effect of computer-aided detection markers on visual search and reader performance during concurrent reading of CT colonography. |
| title_full | The effect of computer-aided detection markers on visual search and reader performance during concurrent reading of CT colonography. |
| title_fullStr | The effect of computer-aided detection markers on visual search and reader performance during concurrent reading of CT colonography. |
| title_full_unstemmed | The effect of computer-aided detection markers on visual search and reader performance during concurrent reading of CT colonography. |
| title_short | The effect of computer-aided detection markers on visual search and reader performance during concurrent reading of CT colonography. |
| title_sort | effect of computer aided detection markers on visual search and reader performance during concurrent reading of ct colonography |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT helbrene theeffectofcomputeraideddetectionmarkersonvisualsearchandreaderperformanceduringconcurrentreadingofctcolonography AT fanshawet theeffectofcomputeraideddetectionmarkersonvisualsearchandreaderperformanceduringconcurrentreadingofctcolonography AT phillipsp theeffectofcomputeraideddetectionmarkersonvisualsearchandreaderperformanceduringconcurrentreadingofctcolonography AT malletts theeffectofcomputeraideddetectionmarkersonvisualsearchandreaderperformanceduringconcurrentreadingofctcolonography AT booned theeffectofcomputeraideddetectionmarkersonvisualsearchandreaderperformanceduringconcurrentreadingofctcolonography AT galea theeffectofcomputeraideddetectionmarkersonvisualsearchandreaderperformanceduringconcurrentreadingofctcolonography AT altmand theeffectofcomputeraideddetectionmarkersonvisualsearchandreaderperformanceduringconcurrentreadingofctcolonography AT taylorsa theeffectofcomputeraideddetectionmarkersonvisualsearchandreaderperformanceduringconcurrentreadingofctcolonography AT manningd theeffectofcomputeraideddetectionmarkersonvisualsearchandreaderperformanceduringconcurrentreadingofctcolonography AT halligans theeffectofcomputeraideddetectionmarkersonvisualsearchandreaderperformanceduringconcurrentreadingofctcolonography AT helbrene effectofcomputeraideddetectionmarkersonvisualsearchandreaderperformanceduringconcurrentreadingofctcolonography AT fanshawet effectofcomputeraideddetectionmarkersonvisualsearchandreaderperformanceduringconcurrentreadingofctcolonography AT phillipsp effectofcomputeraideddetectionmarkersonvisualsearchandreaderperformanceduringconcurrentreadingofctcolonography AT malletts effectofcomputeraideddetectionmarkersonvisualsearchandreaderperformanceduringconcurrentreadingofctcolonography AT booned effectofcomputeraideddetectionmarkersonvisualsearchandreaderperformanceduringconcurrentreadingofctcolonography AT galea effectofcomputeraideddetectionmarkersonvisualsearchandreaderperformanceduringconcurrentreadingofctcolonography AT altmand effectofcomputeraideddetectionmarkersonvisualsearchandreaderperformanceduringconcurrentreadingofctcolonography AT taylorsa effectofcomputeraideddetectionmarkersonvisualsearchandreaderperformanceduringconcurrentreadingofctcolonography AT manningd effectofcomputeraideddetectionmarkersonvisualsearchandreaderperformanceduringconcurrentreadingofctcolonography AT halligans effectofcomputeraideddetectionmarkersonvisualsearchandreaderperformanceduringconcurrentreadingofctcolonography |